Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 5/13/13 3:24 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>> Surely the bundle draft must specify this.
>>
>> My first thought is that the address/port of the *first* m-line in the
>> bundle with a non-zero port will be used for the entire bundle.
>>
>> (This means that when you initially offer a bundle with a bunch of
>> separate ports, you not only must be prepared to use each of those for
>> an unbundled m-line, you must be prepared to use any of them for the
>> complete bundle.)
>
> An offerer sends an initial offer with a bundle of two m-lines: one with port 20000, one with 30000.
>
> The answerer answers, rejecting the first m-line (with port zero) but accepting the bundle.
>
> Should the answerer send traffic to port 20000 or port 30000?

Well, I hadn't considered that possibility, but it is one.

It seems a little weird, but it might have have some benefits for 
implementation.

I guess I don't have a strong opinion, other than the spec must clearly 
say which way it will be.

	Thanks,
	Paul