Re: [MMUSIC] Doodle poll [Re: Moving Forward on 4572-update (was Re: Rough concensus: Re: 4572-update: Consensus call on how to move forward)]

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C306F1299ED for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jwq-ovWaT-eF for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9132D1299EA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uA3DhTpj025128 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:43:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:43:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4DE91E69-5BFB-4481-B9B4-7565C502A422@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc423584-d814-08e1-2588-489ce980b379@cisco.com>
References: <729820D1-4135-4B75-AC85-379A5314CEC7@nostrum.com> <e13f65d8-51cb-e7d4-3c35-a07950daf158@cisco.com> <893bb9c2-5731-511f-0e65-c4490d5bde79@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV7yU8Y1YhDSmm5hSbFSoVLhXvDnKOAs1otmnyf0s5RHw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMFeCkAxOaTPaMZytLmNpbprja5tF5D7RHrejSihN508Q@mail.gmail.com> <AM5PR0701MB2577F7A1A473CE2D5866365B8DAD0@AM5PR0701MB2577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <D4392BDB.120E1%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxsY7+ZHtGJeX7YG=BBYTj4PxEBmgopGQ6u7Hrj2EEgT_Q@mail.gmail.com> <E95B34C4-91EA-41FC-9EAC-D59C77A33C12@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxuRm2tedhBTh096M6N923P6UPmotH-RJOCoqSzGMgE5MQ@mail.gmail.com> <B703A957-C140-4082-BC81-39B161FDEDED@iii.ca> <fc423584-d814-08e1-2588-489ce980b379@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/RxknaZry3pyidKu5YaCa5v7euw0>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Doodle poll [Re: Moving Forward on 4572-update (was Re: Rough concensus: Re: 4572-update: Consensus call on how to move forward)]
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:43:56 -0000

Based on the recent parallel thread, I assume this call is canceled. Is 
that correct?

Thanks!

Ben.

On 28 Oct 2016, at 11:00, Flemming Andreasen wrote:

> Ok - let's proceed that way as the first step then. When will the two 
> of you talk and when will you report back to the WG ?
>
> Assuming that will happen by early next week, I would still like to 
> have a call scheduled for later next week to ensure progress, and it 
> seems everybody except Martin is available Friday at 10 AM Eastern, so 
> that is when we will schedule it.
>
> Best case scenario will be that all is resolved before then and we can 
> cancel the call; worst case we will use the call to prep for further 
> discussion in Seoul. Since Martin is a major stakeholder and not able 
> to participate Friday, there will of course not be any decisions made 
> in the Friday meeting (which in any case would be subject to mailing 
> list confirmation)
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Flemming (with chair hat on)
>
> On 10/28/16 11:24 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would ask two of them to talk and try to come to an agreement.
>> I’m happy to talk to Martin and a time that is more sane for him 
>> and we can report back to the WG.
>>
>> .
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic