Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication
"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Tue, 08 January 2013 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA62B21F84B2 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:46:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.868, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NyQmElRlr7pC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:46:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4166721F8487 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:46:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2192; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1357663619; x=1358873219; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WjC8YtoY6Z0/9JN1BsJSz4quUXLzLK/X6iawFUg/C60=; b=P/El1Wv2ICulyxiQnx7JJJn8aEdUYy3lTJZ8tKrCrDArle065JaR111e aDF/o1VgqysEcry0xcsLv3er+tSNS4+TpSDZyEcljfG5iOWRxvvFDRGA7 D6FoeMayEWpTRF6NNNsARKjKZDWQB8350DppEiweq5s4iGCpNASsJUByv Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAJtM7FCtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABEvVsWc4IeAQEBAwEBAQE3NAsFBwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAQEEDgUIiAkGDKlOjRmQNGEDlyiPLYJ0giY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,432,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="160114820"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2013 16:46:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r08Gkw2W013513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:46:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.223]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:46:58 -0600
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication
Thread-Index: Ac3tn4sLCJXHhYY7RfKGLsAQmCTlmAAUodaA
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:46:57 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CE6D080@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B094294@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B094294@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.148]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <F6993AE6B18293459DBB25D3618EF6A8@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:47:00 -0000
Hi Christer, On Jan 8, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Ali, > > Some initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication: > > Q1: I assume the attribute indicates the SENDING delay, or? I think it needs to be more explicit. > Yes, the dup delay refers to the delay applied during sending. The delay between the dup packets might be different on the receiving side. Is this what you asked? > Q2: There are no SDP Offer/Answer considerations. Does the Offer have impact on the Answer? What is the expected behavior if the Answerer does not support the mechanism? Etc. > This attribute is used with the grouping defined in the other draft. And O/A stuff applies to that grouping semantics, which the draft explains. Maybe, I should put a note regarding this in this draft? Cheers, -acbegen > Regards, > > Christer > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen) > Sent: 4. tammikuuta 2013 0:31 > To: mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts > > Hi everyone, > > The following two drafts have been adopted by MMUSIC a while ago and the main draft discussing the RTP duplication issues is being finalized in AVTEXT (this was also adopted as a WG item a while ago). It is simply waiting for the WG to make a decision on the srcname proposal. > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-duplication-grouping/ > > These two mmusic drafts are essentially completed and they are needed to be done for the avtext draft. I hope they will be WGLC'ed some time soon. In the mean time, I would like to get any comments, feedback that you might have. > > Thanks. > -acbegen > > PS Here is the AVTEXT draft. > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication/ > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
- Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts -… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts -… Ali C. Begen (abegen)