IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] ICE-bis: pacing of ICE connectivity checks

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 18 October 2013 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2641511E819D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3NY3A5s8T9I9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8AA11E8267 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orochi.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9IHUuos081897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:30:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <5261704B.9090307@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:30:51 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
References: <526147C3.9040204@ericsson.com> <CAPvvaa+8osKGTNCS6RJywS9Bmf+RdbnChN=XqA9d+gLnBBAGow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaa+8osKGTNCS6RJywS9Bmf+RdbnChN=XqA9d+gLnBBAGow@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070109050902040904080409"
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE-bis: pacing of ICE connectivity checks
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:31:03 -0000

On 10/18/13 09:44, Emil Ivov wrote:
> It might be worth reminding exactly what these 50ms would be
> protecting us against

They're protecting us against RTP arriving at a rate of 20ms per packet.

> and why is it that we don't need to be
> protected against it in the case of RTP where 20ms is accepted as a
> fine default value.

Well, it's not. This is exactly why we ended up requiring ICE: it 
ensures explicit consent before you start blowing media at someone.

See also http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg04589.html

/a

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status