IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Default candidates

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Mon, 04 November 2013 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C51E11E821C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.294, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr8-ct9MgmvI for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com (mail-pd0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBE221E81C4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x10so7016411pdj.40 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/TJVAps+q7o2HMRgfWeUj/U4J25ySNnenJbutziahFc=; b=RLg7+gY7eiDw30e6Y/VRyqKz02B2gqRUiKxGVmdM12uCC+aH0cdlWsKlkcO2BzK8k+ /E8RI7QYM+muOCjVuig8YRKWwuRzV8pRloACAo9tO2QHpY2VbQnVZFrrWNvQXGHcskAz 6IEOH76yu/kJNI0MK66jfWnhbjQ/m4cXpZMNC7x6MNBJP7B5PMIuNc1KcWR9EeNg9gdu 6YNoEoKvcNhAQgh+yRrCMKo55w1h1a6vIBxDMLgQ9tlwy4Qs91RYNRqdujTw+QtgSUZT eRiuL0QD3PXV+Dgw+hmbks/kGIyfQPZt9zf5JwOVy92zLEAk9BorLJtMqZzhJIsryE37 lhTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7sw9xdMzbqh7JGKpEQPtWOybgDcsvqnlGAesN2pz51GvK0rHLpQe5SpDlH39gNCpA7Osm
X-Received: by 10.66.182.199 with SMTP id eg7mr4409164pac.135.1383592291850; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:11:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x230.google.com (mail-pb0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pl1sm29725092pbb.20.2013.11.04.11.11.30 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id mc17so7496193pbc.21 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:11:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.25.82 with SMTP id a18mr2618806pag.171.1383592290876; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.191.163 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.191.163 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXUtoMxr9uokEdjyzf0kkVmBrkKtiP0wtWuVTKgTOxQDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXUtoMxr9uokEdjyzf0kkVmBrkKtiP0wtWuVTKgTOxQDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:11:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaaJ16mR3YWXZQD6FFpC_ms=tkH1adc0yJx3WOrt7d-7FqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec52992530324c204ea5eaf7b"
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Default candidates
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:11:41 -0000

Relayed candidates are currently RECOMMENDED, which sounds reasonable.

Still, if those are not available, 5245 recommends server reflexive. This
may be problematic in cases where servers that perform latching only do it
for addresses they consider "private".

--sent from my mobile
On 4 Nov 2013 19:34, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> The text is currently a little vague in RFC 5245 on what you select here:
>
> is it the candidate most likely to succeed?
>
> or
>
> is it the candidate most like to be selected?
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.38.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status