Re: [MMUSIC] Why do we need rtcp-mux-exclusive?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDCC1CE077 for <mmusic@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:21:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfc.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrBgdo6l3etx for <mmusic@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463BD1CE076 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id z76so15013803iof.3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:21:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=PRsb1AETASOTHML2s1NUhD14cS9+zhw5ToFfM3IbLU8=; b=DA6/+IJTCV+8tRHXQPnf/4Sq8JBCfBGBR1/atwHoUjghXhrky3l0S/4f9EULPD43gi Ox+D0DNvHKMDUoJh8Pd1hTFBbaRyssUEpnEIoox4POoWSFqQo3lS//YQZG5UJ6kxv1lh 1WmQYf0i31A7CA1jKVe3IHHfxwsRok+lUCE6WmMkbgetXXpsx/hEizQHTza0U+EqKmiq DIrUd09fObGwAmmd3fBKNog/vllHTsdJW0xtNTIvmR2OTcEHdKtZaOtdHUEk3zg4z+WJ AIftuQ1T5cAe5nMDMWnbxn0RjjUiDlMwg2RgOEZkFUtQ+ttM0iaX2GYYec2PyVP7yjRE AHsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=PRsb1AETASOTHML2s1NUhD14cS9+zhw5ToFfM3IbLU8=; b=aHuEcIE6W8gnsaHa7hvYZL3XyYGMfv1zxnz82vhim44S9RbSub6JDJtRsH6JEFn/3N KcCDDYvScymJXZZdbx8ajo9qgo4Fk+6SYjwoWJKY+vVLySOaf/WB+iVwnNf4mu+9GACW 5qG3g/uDVzX9/NDGR55NYr6B2Fj6/C1GuSUYGl15x3oZbfL76kmFjrH74iTlKGspU/il vRediajX18t8xjhRoe0zYU8YQZnHpPvT90rTAzX9AvRgr/khaxa9OAg1gX8k9gdXTY/8 iQoFpGuNVXBJ/L03on9kBS22uF4kTHQ0CzaUwOnd6jWCvmvl+2k2NsNYFcX5B/d37X8k ne9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJItHrzJptLVQLJCbrdtuGafPNvp9f4Ahf9R1dFWM++jbcm6S3H0Y8S5OClUxG8Q1ATxyX8GVpAVlkuwJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.34.139 with SMTP id i133mr22986665ioi.108.1457418065529; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:21:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2ds7bCmLCxmaGyOgNd2P-b3FdBNxhqVC7ucWcQhmcZ+R2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNsJkqGcU3Z=eekP4ntj7r3WMz6YOSiFt=u+HdDH2Zk3Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E5A4E2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBOGpguqkEeUoH35R2S_fOU=eGWgG7r5gmH3T_UHXqRRjg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E5BBC1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBOQKX+LKu1vafq227wv4sy+AApmixGB4fb7wTeuByYTMQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E5C345@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBPNOCTT1ahJsH0OSaOwFnLicFSjHWUbAXxQ3sFu5tUdjA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E7236F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBNtmfjrETCerCu=A5BXt5HRCG+nO4KZ4ze3sBEeRNnX_A@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E7444F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBNvsUNxrX5mx3E19St9CGf7s2vUmoyKAUmWbOw9s7jXfw@mail.gmail.com> <56DE4F09.3030902@cisco.com> <CABkgnnWPJSGmYHbds09iL+NOibm2_x-gE=5YcsS0Wf4tZtyE7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2ds7bCmLCxmaGyOgNd2P-b3FdBNxhqVC7ucWcQhmcZ+R2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:21:05 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV_ChBkVh+yHLpCwvqc99odBLVVyf2L_dAJt-sWp66Nfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/TzO3ssaIJMvhs9zg4vEZQYuX6oQ>
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Why do we need rtcp-mux-exclusive?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:21:07 -0000

On 8 March 2016 at 17:03, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote:
> [BA] Since this relates to ICE, addressing it in RFC 5761bis does not make
> much sense.

I didn't suggest a -bis, which implies an overhaul, just a small patch.