Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-01.txt

[Atle Monrad <[e-mail]>]

Hi

Is it really necessary to chop the draft up in pieces because others may want to use just parts of it? 

I find it more constuctive to finish this draft as is and let other be able to build on and refer to the RFC if and when possible.

/atle

________________________________ 


Atle Monrad
3GPP CT Chairman
Standardization and Regulation,
Group Function Technology and Portfolio Management 
Ericsson


-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
Sent: 28. september 2012 16:47
To: mmusic WG
Cc: Flemming Andreasen (fandreas); [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-01.txt


Major comment 

I think the title stuff should be split out to a separate draft. The main reason is that you might want to build a dvicd that supported title but did not supper the others and still be able to say what you were doing was RFC X. For example, the RTC Web folks may want to use this.

Given the Title is meant to be human readable, I think it needs to be extended to have normal i18n support. 

Cullen



On Sep 6, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This is to announce a 2 week Working Group Last Call for
> 
>      draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-01.txt
> 
> as Proposed Standard. Please review and provide any comments you may have on the document by September 21, 2012. Comments should be sent to the document authors and the MMUSIC WG list. 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
>        Flemming
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Draft Info:
>  This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Miscellanoues Capabilities Negotiation in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
> 	Author(s)       : Miguel A. Garcia-Martin
>                           Simo Veikkolainen
>                           Robert R. Gilman
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2012-08-27
> 
> Abstract:
>    SDP has been extended with a capability negotiation mechanism
>    framework that allows the endpoints to negotiate transport protocols
>    and attributes.  This framework has been extended with a media
>    capabilities negotiation mechanism that allows endpoints to negotiate
>    additional media-related capabilities.  This negotiation is embedded
>    into the widely-used SDP offer/answer procedures.
> 
>    This memo extends the SDP capability negotiation framework to allow
>    endpoints to negotiate three additional SDP capabilities.  In
>    particular, this memo provides a mechanism to negotiate bandwidth
>    ('b=' line), connection data ('c=' line), and titles ('i=' line for
>    each session or media).
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-c
> aps
> 
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-01
> 
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-c
> aps-01
> 
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic