IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 25 April 2013 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DD821F96E6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGGfJ1tp+Um6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D447021F96DE for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3PJYDCs004670 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:34:15 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r3PJYDCT3432439 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r3PJYDQH3438432; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:34:13 -0400
Message-Id: <201304251934.r3PJYDQH3438432@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:36:02 -0000

Two final "compatibility" desiderata.

   DES C8  Offer/answer processing between supporting processors must be
      completed in one exchange.  When interworking between supporting
      and non-supporting processors, it is less desirable but admissible
      that a second offer/answer exchange may be needed to complete
      configuring the multimedia session.

This one is another reason not to use encapsulation/shim:

   DES C9  If an intermediate entity provides transcoding between
      codecs, and if the offer/answer does not specify encryption of a
      media stream, the media stream should be able to take advantage of
      the transcoding facility.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email