[MMUSIC] BUNDLE: SDP O/A Open Issue: Allowed for Offerer to assign same address to multiple m- lines before Answerer has indicated BUNDLE support in SDP Answer?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 17 June 2013 07:20 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=0880946589=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A8421F9AA9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.557, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y+wm4H5FhQAk for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB7F21F9AA8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d6d000003d54-ec-51beb8b0769f
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FF.4C.15700.0B8BEB15; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:20:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC007.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.39]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:20:16 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BUNDLE: SDP O/A Open Issue: Allowed for Offerer to assign same address to multiple m- lines before Answerer has indicated BUNDLE support in SDP Answer?
Thread-Index: Ac5rKvU4HJIKEKnPSluTdQKw8NKY/Q==
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:20:16 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C39EBE8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C39EBE8ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7GHfsCDZruclpMXf6YxYHRY8mS n0wBjFHcNkmJJWXBmel5+nYJ3BnPOk6yFyxTqLgy/Rl7A2OPTBcjJ4eEgIlEy85tTBC2mMSF e+vZuhi5OIQEDjNKXOnbygzhLGKUWLB9PmsXIwcHm4CFRPc/bZAGEQF1ia97e5hBbGGBJYwS t2/XgNSLCKxklHhz9BYjRJGexLUNr8CKWARUJT6vvQC2jVfAV2LOl1ZWEJsRaPP3U2vA4swC 4hK3nsyHukhAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/wG6QEFCUWN4vB1GeL9H8fDErxEhBiZMzn7BMYBSahWTS LCRls5CUQcR1JBbs/sQGYWtLLFv4mhnGPnPgMROy+AJG9lWM7LmJmTnp5YabGIGBf3DLb90d jKfOiRxilOZgURLn/XBqV6CQQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOThDBJdXA2GjcEBMY/S/A rWvbBbXJ7Vejfi59v0v3xt06U8WFcx0n/Sgt1O1dfrh2qXPpqd1tMQtf9/ZMVft/POfIzQMB stapf2tOTZvufSr4e1X79Wm7YuYlfV26O2FZm8RXJuHlC5xtI6NfPAm6unFG+yU9Ztn9sT6y X4UeyTkveb1+y4w9/SsPPYm04FZiKc5INNRiLipOBAAq33MeTwIAAA==
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: SDP O/A Open Issue: Allowed for Offerer to assign same address to multiple m- lines before Answerer has indicated BUNDLE support in SDP Answer?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:20:27 -0000

Hi,

In BUNDLE-04, there are a couple of open issues associated with assigning the same address to multiple m= lines in a BUNDLE group.

The main technical issue is whether it should be allowed to do it *before* the Answerer has, in the SDP Answer, indicated support of BUNDLE.

I.e. should it be allowed to, in the *initial* SDP Offer, assign the same address to multiple m= lines in a BUNDLE group?

Paul has indicated that it should be allowed, if the Offerer e.g. "knows" that the environment where it is operating in supports BUNDLE.

Now, as that is very similar to my original BUNDLE proposal, I would like to hear what others (especially Cullen) thinks about it.

Regards,

Christer