Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg: external rejection of channel

Richard Ejzak <richard.ejzak@gmail.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <richard.ejzak@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5E91A009E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fen2AEvMTcVt for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A721A03F9 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id gl10so673342lab.28 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0baobaDrJzWiMFLPenz5fen8sOpnqUNtpwQ1yALFfJM=; b=1D0B0YHerw1u6rvZltRVjb0N3/J415WIyJ4mUQr5cQXyG1hH5ALkuFy4nUQDVaZoYk pdcgsYeaad67Bvmeb4Nrw7lPyr5VvYVOlc/t2qNQtHMDJ3LIyleePFCzqzO3xRR3YjYe t4dshXRCHYB+wa8SVatBVi+DBEjxCePPBwR1NUT9MQhGgGGjd769rod9Fd3VNVxXMQq2 j94e8d+O7G3qicaMABpEORi5jQxmBWJT51+CLqc7zdlQX/znHCtfeCeDcfaIzOR9Zi8O cwdlb3E2rsjLKg85tdEWUZyzw+H4zZUg2vowjCaRqUq5UoI3Cys/alnkNfsd4PL4GEZq MTFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.27.193 with SMTP id v1mr2655641lag.4.1393424021112; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.98.132 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:13:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1BC516@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1BC516@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:13:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJuyhsyk4jO_TS=5khD9ROAx7uYU1YAkCV0Xy4QVUkiqXBJJfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Ejzak <richard.ejzak@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0158c486cccc1804f34fcf23"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/VFXHdqBe6kWwqHkFz7lpJIKuUAI
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg: external rejection of channel
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:13:47 -0000

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> Section 5.2.2 describes what an answerer does when accepting a data
> channel:
>
>
>
>   "The peer receiving such an SDP offer performs the following:
>
>
>
>                 ...
>
>
>
>    o  For accepted data channels, creates peer instances for the data
>
>       channels with the browser using the channel parameters described
>
>       in the SDP offer.  Note that the browser is asked to create data
>
>       channels with stream identifiers not "owned" by the agent."
>
>
>
> But, there is no text on rejecting a data channel in the SDP answer.
>
>
>
> The answer can of course reject the whole m- line, using port zero in the
> Answer m- line. But, how does the answerer reject an individual
> sub-protocol data channel?
>

Only attributes for "accepted data channels" are included in the SDP
answer, which indicates back to the offerer which ones are rejected (they
just aren't there).  This should be made clearer in the text.


>
>
> Section 5.1.1 says, regarding the SDP dcmap attribute, for accepted data
> channels:
>
>
>
> "This line MUST be replicated without changes in the SDP answer, if
>
>                 the answerer accepts the offered data channel."
>
>
>
> I guess one way to reject would be to simply not include the dcmap
> attribute in the Answer, and the Offerer then needs to figure out what was
> rejected based on the stream values not present in the Answer.
>

Yes.  That is what was intended.

BR, RIchard


>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>