Re: [MMUSIC] How does an answerer reject the first m line in a BUNDLE?
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 25 February 2013 22:45 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6F721E8107 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:45:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.251, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2m8IVH2Jtlai for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A0321E8104 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1PMihVd019522; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:44:45 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r1PMigP12621475; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:44:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r1PMig5U2602337; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:44:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:44:42 -0500
Message-Id: <201302252244.r1PMig5U2602337@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: "Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-reply-to: <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EA7424@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> (richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com)
References: <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F36EA7424@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, christer.holmberg@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] How does an answerer reject the first m line in a BUNDLE?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:45:05 -0000
> From: "Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)" <richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com> > > In rereading your latest BUNDLE draft I was confused about what the > answerer does when it needs to reject the first m line in a bundle > group. The following text in your draft implies to me that the > answerer is not allowed to reject the first m line: My opinion is that handling the "reject the first m= line" problem is sufficiently messy that it is one of the major reasons why we should have a separate bundle media description. A separate bundle media description allows the constituent media descriptions to be accepted or rejected independently without complicated logic to relocate the bundle transport flow information between media descriptions. Dale
- [MMUSIC] How does an answerer reject the first m … Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [MMUSIC] How does an answerer reject the firs… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] How does an answerer reject the firs… Dale R. Worley