Re: [MMUSIC] POF/PAN: Need for more m- lines in the PAN than in the associated POF

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

On 10/21/13 05:04, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following issue is related to the case where a media description 
> in a POF implicitly affect other media descriptions (not present in 
> the POF), but this e-mail looks at a similar case from a PAN perspective.
>
> Section 5.3 says:
>
> If the preceding steps have been performed for each media section
>
>      without resulting in a rejection, then the agent forms a partial
>
>      answer consisting of a single o= line, and all of the media sections
>
>      that were generated as part of the preceding steps. Note that this
>
>      processing will always yield the same number of media sections in a
>
>       partial answer as were present in the partial offer.
>
> The text says that the PAN will contain the same number of media 
> sections as the associated POF. But, what if the POF also caused other 
> media sections to change?
>

Can you give a concrete example of how this might happen?

/a