IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E441A21F9003 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1hj3SowfoUA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACF721F8FDC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f8a6d000001a2d-77-51a32521d8e8
Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 29.67.06701.12523A15; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:19:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 27 May 2013 11:19:28 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
Thread-Index: Ac5H/Rv/zjNZSPPjTceQWRJyHaV9rQPf2J+AAEsPWIAAhJd7cA==
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19:28 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3794D1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B485@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAMRcRGTpn6vpuFWaYts0do2WoKBz1oFoGAXfrcvob05JP0Oy4w@mail.gmail.com> <BLU403-EAS1123D6B15F3BB4909F3088293940@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU403-EAS1123D6B15F3BB4909F3088293940@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra6i6uJAg5d/tSz2L7nMbDF1+WMW ByaPxz1n2DyWLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXR+bmDreAfZ8X648vYGhjvcHYxcnJICJhI LJ6/nhnCFpO4cG89G4gtJHCYUWJVM08XIxeQvYRRYsuyzUBFHBxsAhYS3f+0QWpEBEIk5qzY ywRiCwOFPxxazAJSIiJgKbH6vhdEiZNEw+95bCBhFgFViQcb7UDCvAK+Ei1X37FAbDrOKLH2 qgeIzSlgK9FypAnsAkaga76fWgM2nVlAXOLWk/lMEFcKSCzZcx7qYlGJl4//sYKMlxBQlFje LwdiMgtoSqzfpQ/RqSgxpfshO8RWQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk6CyEjllIOmYh6VjAyLKKkT03MTMn vdx8EyMw/A9u+W2wg3HTfbFDjNIcLErivPq8iwOFBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1 MHI2uV65ofDkS/DGY/aFE5KPX83ZGjnr3eKiqUkzOwqEG1e9Tz9jdHN6Te8Ojmn+J/oms8xc 23Pid5jj39gnDK6eZkYdemYepn396i78c+Qy9BZ+LXz13uHYd3XO6Hu7k5ilQ+Z7PeEUeOWi ojJVf84TPpPli5LEzxhP6v928WTyzfZpXt8nbFFiKc5INNRiLipOBAAwjZvATQIAAA==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19:38 -0000

Hi,

>In order to try to close issues on BUNDLE, based on the discussions we’ve had, I intend to update the BUNDLE draft based on the following assumptions:
>
>1.       We mandate usage of rtcp-mux when BUNDLE is used.
>
>[BA] Agreed.
>
>2.       SDP m- lines with a zero port value MUST NOT be put inside a BUNDLE group (not in an offer, nor in an answer). There will be a note indicating that, 
>due to this, the number of m- lines associated with a BUNDLE group may differ between the offer and the associated answer. There will also be a note 
>indicating that this is due to RFC 5888, in case people later start to wonder where the “MUST NOT” comes from.
>
>[BA] Disagree. 

In case you give the information in another e-mail, you don't have to reply to this e-mail, but otherwise: do you disagree to forbidding port zero in bundle offers, bundle answers, or both? :)

Regards,

Christer

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status