[MMUSIC] Confusion with references to RFC 5245 and draft-5245bis

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 22 February 2016 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F051B2C32; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:00:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yBNSqcgF6klk; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7DE41B2C30; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:00:28 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794c6d000006f31-a9-56cace2b2a83
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.54]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0C.1E.28465.B2ECAC65; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:00:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.73]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:00:26 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Confusion with references to RFC 5245 and draft-5245bis
Thread-Index: AdFtT2VzhFsiwYbeT3qr3Botxh76Rg==
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:00:25 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E2D311@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E2D311ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7ma72uVNhBpu3iFhMXf6YxWLtv3Z2 ByaPJUt+MgUwRnHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlzFq1gqlghnbF8Y7/bA2Md1W7GDk5JARMJBa/Xc4I YYtJXLi3ng3EFhI4zCjxe7dDFyMXkL2YUaLn0VmWLkYODjYBC4nuf9ogNSICPhJff91jBwkL CzhIzDkBFXaV+H79OwuErSexbMp6sPEsAqoS+6e2soGU8wr4SqxujQUJMwJt/X5qDROIzSwg LnHryXwmiGsEJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpJYsf0SI0R9vkTbiR6wVbwCghInZz5hmcAoNAvJ qFlIymYhKYOI60gs2P2JDcLWlli28DUzjH3mwGMmZPEFjOyrGEWLU4uLc9ONjPVSizKTi4vz 8/TyUks2MQLj4uCW37o7GFe/djzEKMDBqMTDa8B5KkyINbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO/Wo0Ah3pTE yqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLErivGuc14cJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGKUqmBWqhG9Mmn3L wHzfv4aNgiKC8WH6ytOnrEuSObxCKDcr4VREYkjFXr014jnuce5RiipRWxk/PpSOyO818F+T cqVq7mTfU1NMdvse+X3mZPfVDvHsKAUvMxWdII+7Uf6nKhq+/J9ktyT5ppvgwYXOd3ceqhI7 dyQvNKfkyf3tD0Nj3zUfUmIpzkg01GIuKk4EADM1jrOHAgAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/XQikhhYsw5fLxusdtVEcA85LFkU>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Confusion with references to RFC 5245 and draft-5245bis
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:00:32 -0000

(Sorry for the cross-posting, but this applies to both MMUSIC and RTCWEB)

Hi,

draft-bundle currently references RFC 5245.

draft-bundle also references draft-ice-sip-sdp, which references draft-5245bis.

draft-bundle also references draft-trickle-ice-sip, which references RFC 5245

JSEP references RFC 5245.

JSEP also references draft-bundle.

My intention is to update the reference in draft-bundle to draft-5245bis - and I REALLY think we should do the same thing in draft-trickle-ice-sip and draft-jsep. Otherwise we will end up with references (explicit or implicit) to both RFC 5245 and draft-5245bis all over, which could end up being REALLY confusing.

I KNOW the reason people want to reference RFC 5245, is because they don't want to create a dependency on draft-5245bis. Well, I think we REALLY shall create such dependency, and then make sure we get draft-5245bis ready (more on that in a separate draft).

Regards,

Christer






So, my intention is to reference draft-5245bis also in BUNDLE.