[MMUSIC] I don't understand why work on SDES should be reviewed by TLS people

zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn Wed, 01 August 2012 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB39A11E80DC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.842, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPVM-3V+GQO8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388AA11E809B for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 10723978252052; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 02:37:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 47492.978252052; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 02:48:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q71ImkbF054752 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 02:48:46 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn)
To: mmusic@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OF54E2C800.D1135322-ON48257A4D.00672623-48257A4D.00674B7D@zte.com.cn>
From: zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 02:48:35 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-08-02 02:48:41, Serialize complete at 2012-08-02 02:48:41
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00674B7748257A4D_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn q71ImkbF054752
Subject: [MMUSIC] I don't understand why work on SDES should be reviewed by TLS people
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:48:57 -0000

Regards~~~

-Sujing Zhou