IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 25 April 2013 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4A521F96BC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrNaUrk7uqcx for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167F421F9670 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3PJXMiB015946; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:33:24 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r3PJXM5O3364035; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:33:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r3PJXMnt3433409; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:33:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:33:22 -0400
Message-Id: <201304251933.r3PJXMnt3433409@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <5178614A.1090207@alum.mit.edu> (pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu)
References: <201304231530.r3NFU9mB3237170@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CABkgnnX__cZddWRm1AX1ie6-W7a=oyprAmpZ5s-2=nTOMqGkxA@mail.gmail.com> <201304231858.r3NIwQYx3263944@shell01.TheWorld.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C35D1A5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <5178614A.1090207@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:34:03 -0000

> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>

> > I mean the latter.  The intended parsing is:
> >
> >      (non-DES) C5  SBCs generally pass through attributes that they do not...

> What evidence do you have to support this assertion?
> AFAIK this is far from universally true.

That's what I've been told, but I haven't surveyed the market very
thoroughly.

What do you think would be a more accurate statement?

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email