Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Sun, 17 July 2016 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014A212D51C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id go2RZxSZoD5f for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8960812D507 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.119.1.10] ([162.216.46.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u6H9cXSn010872 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 17 Jul 2016 04:38:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [162.216.46.3] claimed to be [10.119.1.10]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:38:32 +0200
Message-ID: <6FBB4E31-F1DE-42B5-BAC5-4EE35AF07378@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5062dbbc-3753-9a4b-22fa-f2a3a3cd1470@cisco.com>
References: <5062dbbc-3753-9a4b-22fa-f2a3a3cd1470@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Y2R6504zQmB8WysXKyOj2cYBA_k>
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] IETF 96 MMUSIC Meeting: Move to Friday ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:38:39 -0000

I note that the MMUSIC agenda is primarily (entirely?) about RTCWEB 
dependencies. I assume that most interested parties also had planned to 
attend the Friday RTCWEB meeting. If we do not see major objections 
really soon[1] (as in the next few hours) I will request the change.

[1] I know people may be on airlanes, but the window of opportunity is 
pretty short.

Thanks!

Ben.


On 17 Jul 2016, at 10:51, Flemming Andreasen wrote:

> Greetings
>
> MMUSIC is currently scheduled to meet Tuesday 11:30-12:30, which 
> partially overlaps with the QUIC BOF (which we expect a lot of people 
> will want to attend). RTCWeb has given up their Friday slot 
> (12:20:13:20) and we have been given the offer to move MMUSIC to that 
> slot.
>
> Before doing so we wanted to hear from folks if they are in favor of 
> this or not (we are obviously looking to maximize the attendance, 
> especially from the key stakeholders).
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Flemming (as MMUSIC co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic