[MMUSIC] SIP-SDP: Verify decision made in Seoul regarding non-supported transport in m- line of answer

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137FF129B38 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:32:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WM4UCntt-2to for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDEF129539 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:32:40 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-2f75798000002085-a6-5878bad637ba
Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.57]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FE.0F.08325.6DAB8785; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:32:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.169]) by ESESSHC013.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.57]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:32:28 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SIP-SDP: Verify decision made in Seoul regarding non-supported transport in m- line of answer
Thread-Index: AQHSbZC3rKfnMMWZkkWeC738BQ54bA==
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:32:27 +0000
Message-ID: <D49E87A9.15A0C%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D49E87A915A0Cchristerholmbergericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7pe61XRURBo9OmVtMXf6YxYHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGc8mJxa0S1bM+/KbtYHxrUgXIyeHhICJxJXPT1i6GLk4hATW MUrcP7qHDcJZwijx5vMWIIeDg03AQqL7nzZIg4iAusTXvT3MIGFhgQyJgxMqIMK5EufPLwOr FhHQk/j4XRIkzCKgKnF/zXkmkDCvgLXE9dVpIGFGATGJ76fWMIHYzALiEreezGeCuEZAYsme 88wQtqjEy8f/WEFsUaCJy5+vgYorSuw8284M0Zsgcf5bNyOIzSsgKHFy5hOWCYxCs5CMnYWk bBaSMoi4gcT7c/OZIWxtiWULX0PZ+hIbv5xlhLCtJTp7jrAgq1nAyLGKUbQ4tbg4N93ISC+1 KDO5uDg/Ty8vtWQTIzBGDm75bbWD8eBzx0OMAhyMSjy8BVwVEUKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEePO3 AYV4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInzmq28Hy4kkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgVN/JFvI0 O1NHa01vpHmBb/X/SK069jbZjBPvTGJu6Pv2WLcvFuhdHCGUc4T75+EVOQsN2d+s1Gus6XzL tSz51RmDZz9CN3/3dLtwaW/b4RDD1InRu29GvzknJdP5KP4cJ9fBskn6nS3WPjxlWgHSBw9x S/lGzZ5x9cJ212OH6l3E7EXn7O9WYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA5Cz76o0CAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/YFwvJ4mBy3ohXNfQJGGSXqJkEVI>
Subject: [MMUSIC] SIP-SDP: Verify decision made in Seoul regarding non-supported transport in m- line of answer
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:32:43 -0000

Hi,

In Seoul we discussed a number of issues related to ICE-SDP. We made some decisions, and I got action points to verify one of those on the list.

The associated slides can be found here:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-00.pdf


The issue (slides 4-6) was when an answerer receives an offer with a m- line transport that it doesn’t support. The current O/A rules say that the transport in the answer must match the transport in the offer.

However, if ICE is used, there may be transports (offered using ICE candidates) that the answerer DOES support.

Based on the discussions, there was strong consensus to go for Alt#2, which was allowing a transport in the m- line of the answer even if the answerer doesn’t support it, as ICE candidates will be used to determine the transport.

Does anyone object to Alt#2?

Regards,

Christer