Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 02 November 2012 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7271F0C82 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPemtyfOS3-x for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568921F0C7F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.12.11.26] ([4.30.77.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qA2IlDUJ053133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:47:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <508DA17F.8000701@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:47:13 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80E6D387-9BA3-4D3F-9010-219E0C1F05CB@nostrum.com>
References: <507FC10D.60500@ericsson.com> <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE2230EEFA5@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <CAPvvaaKZffFmXHR2rwovkPKfUez+SsBSF7K=p3Jb7E00Y1rbBw@mail.gmail.com> <508CFE3B.1050000@ericsson.com> <508DA17F.8000701@alum.mit.edu>
To: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 4.30.77.1 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latching draft
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:47:16 -0000
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I support this - I think it is desirable to have this behavior documented, since behavior similar to this is fairly widespread. Hopefully having it documented will help prevent gratuitous variation. +1, with a bit of trepidation. But Paul has the right of it.
- [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: latchi… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Dan Wing
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Emil Ivov
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Enrico Marocco
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Parthasarathi R
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Rockson Li (zhengyli)
- Re: [MMUSIC] WG Poll for consensus on WG item: la… Ben Campbell