Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda for Interim

This is a good agenda - for an MMUSIC WG interim (only day 3 has any RTCWEB items on it).

Since there is a notice requirement, can we get MMUSIC on board so the interim can actually take place?

On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:13, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Chairs,
> 
> I've spent some time thinking about the agenda for the interim, and
> thought it might be helpful if I sent you a strawman based on the
> items that are blocking progress in terms of implementation and
> interoperability.
> 
> Note:
> I am assuming 4 hours each day. The times have been selected with
> the objective of giving us enough time to really resolve the
> open issues. Honestly, we might even add more time for
> the issues on day 1.
> 
> Hope this is helpful.
> 
> Day 1
> 2:00    Bundle   [Holmberg]
> 	Objective: select an approach and work out enough
> 	details that the editors can work to produce a
> 	suitable draft.
> 
> 	Drafts:
> 	- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
> 	- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-one-rtp
> 	- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-mmt-negotiation
> 
> 
> 2:00    Multiple flow SDP representation [Jennings, Alvestrand]
> 	Objective: decide on an architecture for large numbers
> 	of similar streams (e.g., multiple video streams).
> 
> 	Drafts:
> 	- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid
> 	- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-mmusic-msid
> 	- Do we have a "master" document for the single m-line case?
> 	- Multiple m-lines doesn't have a document
> 
> 
> Day 2
> 1:30    Mapping stream/track label concepts SDP identifiers [Alvestrand]
> 	Objective: determine requirements
> 	
> 	
> 1:30    Trickle ICE open issues [Ivov(?), Uberti, Rescorla]
> 	
> 	- Starting checks
> 	- Termination conditions
> 	- Error handling
> 	
> 	Drafts:
> 	http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle		
> 
> 1:00    SDP for Datachannels open issues [Jesup, Loreto]
> 	Objective: resolve open issues (post WGLC?)
> 
> 	Drafts:
> 	http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-02
> 
> Day 3
> 1:00    Other recommended audio codecs [Roach]
> 	
> 	Objective: identify what other audio codecs we intend to
> 	recommend.	
> 
> 1:00    Process WGLC comments on documents [authors]
> 
> 0:30    Other business
> 
> 0:30    Wrapup/next steps [Chairs]
> 
> 
> Best,
> -Ekr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb