IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Fwd: TURN candidates priority

Mallinath Bareddy <mallinath@google.com> Thu, 18 April 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mallinath@google.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C4321F93B3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvG-SLQpBTBz for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31BA21F93BE for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t2so423958qcq.28 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Nj5VWTWXUd8z0q2/vyQG/lL6qyLxOjrSt4TVPDsM38I=; b=Bco7+7lpeo7unRCxtnJ7NPat8fahgKyVINVpgmBt1B1ProWAIsGFlijdxbck7+QohV H3az3SyH/w7pTX8YzzMTFGuYzzQ257AJ2DOHQgx9kx4oDA4fWsgROChKASY7eOkJZ4hm /9oc0DBiR+JEl0/3Xg0yjwt8M9VTZEXgiGPrteiZVRDU6psUdkXfPqEtkVBUHSaBOfXN E5x8TaiFYTBm/yfCPuNGQ3L0qYpEk3o3B8ulV78IS+Af4bIxl2gnJiOe1PneRXnl0FMD i7ZZrkH5Cl3fyxQ+d+3lP+92fyXZMThIaMgZ8plR0FOFwJ5R++P1ATr6108mJz1RPBUU uFPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Nj5VWTWXUd8z0q2/vyQG/lL6qyLxOjrSt4TVPDsM38I=; b=WC5VPq4pg/4obO0LgJQnVmfZ3pGS73nknbcRZZGuoPn3Y+i5V8/B1EDHgXYwPvp2df H1sl3QYLgqpuR5PAhbsv0TZMV0BKNk+UXHysiI7dhd7AXSvEJb4V2Ttk+FekBdcNFmwz h4y+zUqY78cZBPTwZ4yFqoh04NbroDyJe2J9QwhQEdx5IBBeBmFfXpfYlRb5x0AS7QSJ i0OQ7zKUcywp6URmddsQwPrTbXp63opB+pl8zyLBWwqVLdGRrURNLT8r7jTlYzBzp2il B9UzMj4+o95y3DHYh8KTyfs7rXREKfThbtAtqumKjqTZg1lKhIlqjDoa54tcj6TOHP++ UwHQ==
X-Received: by 10.49.127.8 with SMTP id nc8mr12753983qeb.31.1366306052693; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.112.75 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAErhfrwURKfVegAyzBehv2wafd7dWJ1ir2S4rtLRM5vi33KCSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJjP_Q-ZX+fQLc_gjF8RchfJQrOA=58P7TzsgQ0mT3T4zP4vNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrweB6ZRvsTYaXA_mSraLn0UMEKQPWy_PSrEFvSQ+VuBgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErhfrwURKfVegAyzBehv2wafd7dWJ1ir2S4rtLRM5vi33KCSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mallinath Bareddy <mallinath@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:27:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJjP_Q8G2G8drLLz6eFb5r4ocpYZX+gPRJMz0r20wfva7m5Pjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b672e26ecf26104daa5ea86"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlelFPJQmRXeU38pyFzq1DYogaimcFg/y0Wp8+yp3h0+ElBFSppZCcLVvHV7xfPc8kOri3du0IKhwUtPbIpGlFd5ugM/QW41LIA+IaLoqy+eEHR133Ly+hFMJOWOYmzbIKXcIp6/5+gXtkHk8CTcndAHcpJCMQjfAxAU2FLsJUc8WwGQC7nU1HRQmTyFCFxumRYC5Yp
Cc: IETF MMUSIC WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Fwd: TURN candidates priority
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:27:41 -0000

I am not sure  http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6544#section-4.2 addresses the
problem, as the candidate is still a relay candidate and allocation is UDP.
Only difference here is that transport protocol between client and server
is changed from UDP to TCP.





On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@orange.com>
> Date: Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] TURN candidates priority
> To: Mallinath Bareddy <mallinath@google.com>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> There are some recommendations in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6544#section-4.2.
>
> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Mallinath Bareddy <mallinath@google.com>wrote:
>
>> What should be the TURN candidate priority when obtained over TCP/TLS vs
>> UDP?
>>  If same candidate priority used, this could lead to a undesired
>> candidate paring, even though better option may be available.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mallinath
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email