Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 5/13/13 7:58 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We seem to have an agreement that, when an SDP offer contains an m- line
> associated with a bundle group, it is ok to leave that m- line outside
> the bundle group in the SDP Answer.
>
> Now, there has been some discussions about “splitting” a BUNDLE, meaning
> that an m- line in an SDP Answer is added to a DIFFERENT bundle group
> than in the SDP Offer.
>
> Based on the discussions, it seems like people would be ok to NOT allow
> that. If the SDP Answerer wants to put an m- line in another bundle
> group, it needs to first reply to the SDP Offer, and then send a new SDP
> Offer itself, putting the m- line in the bundle group it wants.
>
> In short, is basically means: in an SDP Answer, an m- line must only be
> bundle grouped with the same m- lines (or, a subset of those) as in the
> associated SDP Offer.

Yes, this is the conclusion I reached. I wish it weren't true. But I 
think there must be a mechanism for the new bundle to be rejected, and 
if it is first proposed in the answer then that isn't possible.

IMO this is a rare enough case that suffering another O/A is acceptable.

	Thanks,
	Paul