Re: [MMUSIC] Bundle, TURN and Legacy Interop

"Hutton, Andrew" <> Wed, 13 March 2013 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0F511E80DC for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.563
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tg+Hb2Rhd9g5 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC49711E80D9 for <>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Server) with ESMTP id E1FB61EB8561; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:00:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:00:41 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <>
To: Christer Holmberg <>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Bundle, TURN and Legacy Interop
Thread-Index: Ac4gJWBA5pPebVuMT3uFsh7F2mnB0f//8m4AgAAedU4=
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:00:40 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4411CF98016E4DB18709594312EDB4D1siemensenterprisecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Bundle, TURN and Legacy Interop
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:00:47 -0000

There is if you have been configured to use TURN and are known to need to use it.


On 13 Mar 2013, at 16:11, "Christer Holmberg" <<>> wrote:


Nothing prevents you from only sending host candidates in the first offer, of you want to do.



Sent from Windows using TouchDown (<>)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hutton, Andrew [<>]
To:<> [<>]
Subject: [MMUSIC] Bundle, TURN and Legacy Interop

It seems that one of the motivations of the current bundle-03 proposal is that the first offer is compatible with a legacy device and that a second offer is required for bundle (See

One issue that I see is that if TURN is being used there could be a significant overhead in creating the first offer is multiple TURN allocations are needed for each m-line which will all then have to be released if bundle is used.

I am not sure if there is a way to avoid this other but the draft should I think mention this issue.

mmusic mailing list<>