IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] Congestion controll

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 06 June 2013 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6209C21F9691 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChLsuyJh9mRS for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6671921F88EA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.70.233.131] (unknown [64.104.46.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8E5A22E255; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 01:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BLU403-EAS336A4AA94CDB5E97170F9A5939F0@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:46:20 +0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <25B9903E-DC06-4BB0-92A1-C1E7A2AA569E@iii.ca>
References: <20130530185619.4124.56395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A87F91.2080500@jitsi.org> <51AEA08D.8090103@cisco.com> <BLU403-EAS336A4AA94CDB5E97170F9A5939F0@phx.gbl>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Congestion controll
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:46:30 -0000

On Jun 5, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:

> As they stand, both Plan A nor Plan B result in O/A exchanges that aren't needed and will break congestion control

Bernard - that's a pretty strong statement. Uh, you want to explain how either plan A or B break congestion control?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email