IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines? - A new take.

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B181A0051 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:17:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16CQs9ku-cyy for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:17:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E3B1A0040 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d8e000002a7b-cf-531480fb48aa
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 47.B5.10875.BF084135; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 14:17:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.216]) by ESESSHC005.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 14:17:46 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines? - A new take.
Thread-Index: Ac824vtSFLJVCI5rSOGVBTMx34MhTQ==
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:17:45 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C6336@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C6336ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7vBpFgg2urhC2mLn/M4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujAu7/jAXNNtW9PRsZWtg3GnexcjJISFgInH/0gZGCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgKHGCWOX3vKCOEsZpT4/bMByOHgYBOwkOj+pw3SICKgLvF1bw8zSI2wQCujxOxf m1hAHBGBLkaJzZ0PWCGq9CR+XXvMBmKzCKhITDx/CGwdr4CvxNeLv8FqGIFWfz+1hgnEZhYQ l7j1ZD4TxEkCEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0ms2H6JEaI+X+LbiRWsEDMFJU7OfMIygVFoFpJR s5CUzUJSBhHXkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2YY+8yBx0zI4gsY2VcxsucmZuaklxtuYgSG/sEtv3V3 MJ46J3KIUZqDRUmc98Nb5yAhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjOX1AuqWeddMfa6L B0aq7jl6+OneCTmzk4MWX1+ia+XOJ8XfI3JnzdTemUFGDRXcIouEXrtbzr7LLq5UPHG54sM7 M90PKWv+k6vkbduYeJb10qlvZ9/EvDXe+3iSnd/BeQWfny7YWztZhqFhhakfw5uHE40u5J95 vcDKYu7f6Uqtz1hM50Xf/aPEUpyRaKjFXFScCADSqxDZSwIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/_9WCPT3VR56KaynHdgoPr_lAeDE
Subject: [MMUSIC] IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines? - A new take.
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:17:53 -0000

Hi,

Based on the discussions, we basically have two alternatives:

Alternative 1: Forbid the usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines.

Alternative 2: Allow usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines, and if the answer does not support whatever extensions that are needed for the offerer to distinguish the media, the offer needs to handle that, e.g. by sending a new offer with unique PT values.

IF we choose Alternative 2, we still need to decide whether we let the offerer decide when it's "appropriate" when to use the same PT value, or whether we need to specify some rules (as suggested by Colin). My personal proposal is still to let the offerer decide, and not specify any rules.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email