Re: [MMUSIC] RTSP 2.0 SDP issue: Directionality attribute

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 22 March 2013 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0185D21F8D8D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e5Bjd2wuPK0n for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2C721F8B7C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-15-514c80d997d1
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BE.14.19728.9D08C415; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:03:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:03:37 +0100
Message-ID: <514C80D8.2030802@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:03:36 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
References: <51425974.9070608@ericsson.com> <201303151431.r2FEVHJ9498642@shell01.TheWorld.com> <514767D1.3000906@ericsson.com> <201303191937.r2JJbEWO763574@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201303191937.r2JJbEWO763574@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rvdmg0+gwZ4tvBZTlz9msXh5osyB yWPy/q/MHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgymjsXcBWcE244tiFHvYGxjX8XYycHBICJhIr t81gh7DFJC7cW88GYgsJnGSU+DXREsJezijx76g8iM0roC0xf0MjWD2LgKrEuq/zmEBsNgEL iZs/GsF6RQWCJX6+OsMCUS8ocXLmEyCbg0NEQFOiY0EOSJhZQFjiwvnjYK3CAk4SH5bcAGrl Alq1kVHi/PRusASngL3EjZnNjBC3SUpsedHODtGsJzHlagsjhC0v0bx1NjPEndoSDU0drBMY hWYhWT0LScssJC0LGJlXMbLnJmbmpJcbbWIEhunBLb9VdzDeOSdyiFGag0VJnDfc9UKAkEB6 YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk6pBkb5c8IXE5/qVSyfUmf9QFOO6/Q+h3/PDm4OnmabNPfA RyadjKQuRy6jKy0fZ6gf27RkQUQJd/uHgi1mdjyCTYmh+n+rJmUfe79NamJR9uaHF55FpXzm bJm+9c8cbp09Nls2JB1Pb1Zqn9q/cs+TivVNnuH7P+5st72xI/z9C7XYo8ffFYe334tQYinO SDTUYi4qTgQAG8rkGCECAAA=
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] RTSP 2.0 SDP issue: Directionality attribute
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:03:39 -0000

Dale,

Thanks for the input. I have tried to address your input in this version:

   This appendix describes how an SDP file determines the operation of
   an RTSP session.  Thus, it is worth pointing out that the
   interpretation of the SDP is done in the context of the SDP receiver,
   which is the one being configured.  This is the same as in SAP
   [RFC2974]; this differs from SDP Offer/Answer [RFC3264] where the SDP
   describes what the agent providing the SDP is ready to receive and
   willing to send.

Cheers

Magnus

On 2013-03-19 20:37, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
>>
>> I thus propose a more generic version of your text in the D. section:
>>
>>    This appendix describes how an SDP file determines the operation of
>>    an RTSP session.  Thus, it is worth pointing out that the
>>    interpretation of the SDP is done in the context of the SDP receiver
>>    is the one being configured.  This is the same as in SAP [RFC2974],
>>    this differs from SDP Offer/Answer [RFC3264] where the SDP describes
>>    what the peer agent is ready to receive and willing to send.
> 
> I agree with the overall concept, but there are some edits that would
> help:
> 
> There's some flaw in the wording around "of the SDP receiver is the
> one".  Perhaps it was intended to be "... of the SDP receiver, which
> is the one being configured."?
> 
> Strictly, in "the same as in SAP [RFC2974],", the final "," should be
> ";", as the two things being joined are complete sentences.
> 
> The final clause does not seem definite enough to me, as "the peer
> agent" is used rather than "the agent sending the SDP".  I suppose
> that is the meaning that it must have, but in many situations, "the
> peer agent" is used to denote the agent at the *other end* of the
> connection from the agent being described.  So I would say "where the
> SDP describes what the agent sending it is ready to receive and
> willing to send."
> 
> Dale
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------