Re: [MMUSIC] Single SCTP usage per SDP session?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Mon, 01 December 2014 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786171ACCC7 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:15:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKJEfIR5x6QJ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46AB01A913B for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.227]) by resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id NNFA1p0054ueUHc01NFhYg; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:15:41 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id NNFh1p0093Ge9ey01NFhzl; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:15:41 +0000
Message-ID: <547CE88C.40605@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:15:40 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D534E7B@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <2649C056-4D86-4448-B71F-A42954E1BF49@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D538EF9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <07B6DC62-93DB-4C15-BECE-68BB70B663FB@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D5390C0@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17828E63E883@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D539F4F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D539F4F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1417472141; bh=JAmHZkL4SWP2bYsL8sMn733ea03mdinsXQ09hPXUeyk=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=USWitme2LPyAxHx1e3A48rurvBz81/AqW+j18nSlVRi+LSn7lYjnlPW2lenQbM9VF E02XIh3uV/k+mrUmOdVESFSy11B5JhJqIADBYJyrvfhCul2TEZRKpy6xzjYK7BfYE9 C9vCOyoq8K6Q8SBs9dZ6Y2aCZfYmdKCpJy3FYJe8kV+C9y9Wp43uLsjCpa37DR6eL5 J/PMpPyQmB2lZ5nbI/Ulw2rI0O4tKB+/klgaQVkWdqEb0tHTXMCromKh7Oo/nZ6vS8 DItDpsZNL2oqJIOL4VRUIdFGLwhhpKYmcIadQ1O3bi5tjJhtxPv5YFIRUu89zi1o85 bTlzgW8ydVUmg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/aJCQE-9LRAzuz5Hs_cdXPkBxLS8
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Single SCTP usage per SDP session?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:15:43 -0000

On 11/26/14 2:00 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:

> <Raju>
>> Per my understanding, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps just talks about SCTP over DTLS and allowing multiple SCTP associations, which is perfectly fine.
>> Then it is possible to come up with SCTP-SDP semantics to use that capability.
>> One m= line allowing one SCTP over DTLS limit is fine. Using BUNDLE you can replicate same 4-tuple in multiple m= lines. Then there is only one DTLS association
>> established and multiple SCTP associations over that is possible (one per m= line).
>> If BUNDLE is not used then I believe same 4-tuple on multiple m= lines are NOT possible. This is because, per my understanding, unlike TCP/native-SCTP used under non-
>> ICE environments, in ICE-environments the TCP/UDP port specified is used both as client and server port for DTLS.
>
> Even with BUNDLE, you would have to use the same m= line port value from the beginning, which is not allowed. So, you basically would have to add the additional SCTPoDTLS m= lines once the usage of BUNDLE has been negotiated.

bundle-only would allow you to set this up.

	Thanks,
	Paul