Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-01
Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 02:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7715B1A89D3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Da3agjo2sPjW for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cserver5.myshophosting.com (cserver5.myshophosting.com [175.107.161.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3B71A89AF for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp118-209-28-218.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.28.218]:52274 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by cserver5.myshophosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>) id 1YVsgM-0006DO-UI for mmusic@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:17:07 +1100
Message-ID: <5500F7C2.7070004@nteczone.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:19:46 +1100
From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <54FD7E79.8010600@alcatel-lucent.com> <54FE6446.7020007@nteczone.com> <5500623B.9070604@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5500623B.9070604@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cserver5.myshophosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nteczone.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cserver5.myshophosting.com: authenticated_id: christian.groves@nteczone.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/aSLimlnp2lwo3E4STlzhZpqR1L0>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel-01
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:19:53 -0000
Hello Juergen, No problem, please see my responses below. Regards, Christian On 12/03/2015 2:41 AM, Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler wrote: > Hello Christian, > > Thanks much for your comments. > Please see my remarks inserted below. > > Thanks, > Juergen > > On 10.03.2015 04:25, Christian Groves wrote: >> Hello Juergen, >> >> Thanks for the update. Some comments: >> 5.1.1.1 - The section indicates that the max-retr, max-time and >> ordered parameters shall not be used. I take it then that the SCTP >> Stream used for MSRP must be DATA_CHANNEL_RELIABLE? If so it might be >> better to say what is used rather than what is not. > > [Juergen] Agree. Would propose to replaced current sentence "The > max-retr, max-time and ordered parameters shall not be used" with > "Ordered and reliable data channels MUST always be used, such that the > 'max-retr' and 'max-time' parameters SHALL NOT be used. > If the 'ordered' parameter is used, then its value MUST be equal to > 'true'." [CNG] OK > > ..snip.. > >> >> 5.1.1.2: MSRP "max-size" would it be worth to note that this must be >> less than the SCTP SDP max-message-size value? > > [Juergen] That's a good point. As far as I understand the > a=max-message-size value > is related to the “maximum message size that an SCTP endpoint is > willing to receive” > as per draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-14, sec 6.1, whereas the MSRP > specific a=max-size attribute > refers to the maximum MSRP message size an endpoint is willing to > accept (as per 4975, sec 8.6), > thus is not related to the maximum MSRP message chunk size. > Would you be OK if we added a sentence to 5.1.1.2 saying that an MSRP > session endpoint > MUST NOT send MSRP message chunks larger than the peer’s > a=max-message-size value? [CNG] Yes. > >> >> 5.1.1.2: "Setup" is this relevant for MSRP using data channel? The >> SCTP-SDP draft etc. give rules as to which endpoint establishes >> different parts of the transport connection? > > [Juergen] Good point, too. The msrp-usage draft requires MSRP UAs > using data channel transport > to support the MSRP CEMA extension as described in RFC 6714. This > again refers to RFC 6135, > which uses the a=setup attribute value to determine the "active" MSRP > UA, which is responsible for sending > the initial MSRP SEND message (which might be empty). > Also msrp-usage draft's section 5.1.2 currently requests the "active" > MSRP endpoint to send an > MSRP SEND message as as soon as the associated data channel instance > is opened. > Per draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-14 the "a=setup" attribute contained in > the DTLS/SCTP based media description > is used to determine the TCP (if used) and DTLS client/server roles. > But this usage of the "a=setup" attribute > is different than the usage of "a=setup" as described in RFC 6135's > section 4.2. > I assume we may have to describe more explicitly in msrp-usage how it > is determined if an MSRP endpoint > becomes "active" (and sends the initial MSRP SEND message). [CNG] Yes I think its important to cover the this aspect. > >> >> 5.1.1.3: a=sctp-port 5000 should have a colon e.g. a=sctp-port:5000 > > [Juergen] Thanks. We'll correct this. > >> >> 5.1.5: This section indicates that closing is done as per >> I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg. However clause >> 5.2.4/I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg indicates that closure is >> sub-protocol specific. Its not clear to me whether this the >> sub-protocol should indicate the use of the SCTP reset or the use of >> SDP O/A? > > [Juergen] The intention in 5.1.5 is to refer to the generic data > channel closure procedure based on > the SCTP stream reset mechanism, and that additionally per new SDP > offer / answer exchange > the a=dcmap and a=dcsa attribute lines associated with the MSRP > session need to be removed > from the DTLS/SCTP based media description. > Would you agree if we explicitly said: > “The closure of an MSRP session MUST be signaled via an SDP offer / > answer exchange which > removes the "a=dcmap:" and "a=dcsa:" attribute lines associated with > the MSRP session from > the associated DTLS/SCTP based media description. > This results in the associated data channel being closed as well as > per [I-D.ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg].” [CNG] This wording is better. Is the SCTP reset at the same time as the SDP Offer? > >> >> Regards, Christian >> >> > > [snip] > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic… Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic… Christian Groves
- [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic-msr… Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic… Christian Groves
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic… Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler
- Re: [MMUSIC] New draft version: draft-ietf-mmusic… Christian Groves