Re: [MMUSIC] Open Issues: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast-03

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 22 October 2015 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AAF1B4211 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oiij5e7wa1d9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE421B2DB6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (cpe-70-122-154-80.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.154.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9MLES5H097675 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:14:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-154-80.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.154.80] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
References: <56294C8A.1030205@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGEkh6iP-dLXF-zESi0pzGy1WvM+E084tC9nv=CmSs6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <562951AE.8080602@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:14:22 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUGEkh6iP-dLXF-zESi0pzGy1WvM+E084tC9nv=CmSs6Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/bCKIxicSh5s7gUtlGsvglj0iBlM>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Open Issues: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-simulcast-03
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:14:32 -0000

On 10/22/15 4:05 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote:
> To me, making PT-based simulcast mandatory is not an option compatible 
> with WebRTC 1.0.  If we make it mandatory, then we make these drafts 
> unusable for WebRTC 1.0. 

Yeah, so another nail in that coffin. Like I said in my earlier message, 
I don't think there's any sensible path that makes it mandatory, and 
that's even without bringing WebRTC into the analysis.

/a