Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE TEXT: De-mux procedures (June 19th)

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 6/19/13 12:32 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 05:56 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The question is whether we shall specify exactly how entities
>> associate RTP packets with the correct m= lines, or whether we shall
>> simply give some guidelines and hints.
>> For example, a client can choose to use unique PT values per m-
>> values, within a given BUNDLE group, and everything should work fine.
>> And, if the endpoint runs out of PT values, the create a new BUNDLE
>> group. Now, whether it's religiously correct, I don't know :)
>> OR, if the endpoints are able to signal which SSRCs they are going to
>> use, they can use that.
>> OR, if the endpoints support some kind of RTP header extension for
>> this purpose, they can use that.
>
> OR, if they don't care which M-line the stream is associated with, the
> question may be moot.

I think this is a silly argument. If they don't care which m-line the 
stream is associated with then there was no need to insert the m-line.

If there is a reason to have the m-lines, then there needs to be a way 
to associate packets with m-lines.

	Thanks,
	Paul