Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E47A21F905F; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8VzJSP47cD9; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D49121F86F0; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W108 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:09 -0700
X-EIP: [z+ikBbIH0mZ0gFFuDSFbCAnQhucye7spSp/gk4LOp2Y=]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W108984F1E5A706E919E7BD693BA0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f739abbd-a421-4394-b155-2762a690f704_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:09 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <518900CF.6050403@alvestrand.no>
References: <20130503054601.4639.64651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAi_Lx3QFCbBQ5aPNkgorJAff0E79jkpbQX1Qt3wf2bzg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAOJ7v-1Wk6u7XiYrNVmoqr5Jisu2WRvZpte7hQTOiP8YHUc6hg@mail.gmail.com>, <008701ce4b21$a0997aa0$e1cc6fe0$@gmail.com>, <518900CF.6050403@alvestrand.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2013 22:02:09.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[85502170:01CE4B6E]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:02:17 -0000

Roni said: 

I
            think that plan B is the right direction. I am wondering if
            this should be discussed in RTCWEB or MMUSIC
      
    
    

    To the extent that the proposals are attempts to "profile" existing RFCs or MMUSIC work in progress for use in WebRTC, it seems to me like the discussion belongs in RTCWEB. One advantage of that approach is that the solution need not necessarily apply to "all uses of SDP for any scenario for all time", just to the WebRTC use cases. 

To the extent that NEW SDP functionality is needed, MMUSIC discussion would be appropriate.  But until the general direction is decided, it won't be clear what the required new functionality is (if any).