Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 7E47A21F905F; Tue,  7 May 2013 15:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8VzJSP47cD9;
 Tue,  7 May 2013 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com
 [65.55.116.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D49121F86F0;
 Tue,  7 May 2013 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W108 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s25.blu0.hotmail.com
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:09 -0700
X-EIP: [z+ikBbIH0mZ0gFFuDSFbCAnQhucye7spSp/gk4LOp2Y=]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W108984F1E5A706E919E7BD693BA0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_f739abbd-a421-4394-b155-2762a690f704_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>,
 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:09 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <518900CF.6050403@alvestrand.no>
References: <20130503054601.4639.64651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <CALe60zAi_Lx3QFCbBQ5aPNkgorJAff0E79jkpbQX1Qt3wf2bzg@mail.gmail.com>,
 <CAOJ7v-1Wk6u7XiYrNVmoqr5Jisu2WRvZpte7hQTOiP8YHUc6hg@mail.gmail.com>,
 <008701ce4b21$a0997aa0$e1cc6fe0$@gmail.com>, <518900CF.6050403@alvestrand.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2013 22:02:09.0543 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[85502170:01CE4B6E]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for
 draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>,
 <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>,
 <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:02:17 -0000

--_f739abbd-a421-4394-b155-2762a690f704_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roni said:=20

I=0A=
            think that plan B is the right direction. I am wondering if=0A=
            this should be discussed in RTCWEB or MMUSIC=0A=
      =0A=
    =0A=
   =20
=0A=
    To the extent that the proposals are attempts to "profile" existing RFC=
s or MMUSIC work in progress for use in WebRTC=2C it seems to me like the d=
iscussion belongs in RTCWEB. One advantage of that approach is that the sol=
ution need not necessarily apply to "all uses of SDP for any scenario for a=
ll time"=2C just to the WebRTC use cases.=20

To the extent that NEW SDP functionality is needed=2C MMUSIC discussion wou=
ld be appropriate.  But until the general direction is decided=2C it won't =
be clear what the required new functionality is (if any). =20
=0A=
   =20
=0A=
    =0A=
      =0A=
       =20
 		 	   		  =

--_f739abbd-a421-4394-b155-2762a690f704_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>Roni said: <br><br><div><blockqu=
ote cite=3D"mid:008701ce4b21$a0997aa0$e1cc6fe0$@gmail.com"><div class=3D"ec=
xWordSection1"><p class=3D"ecxMsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt=3B=
font-family:&quot=3BCalibri&quot=3B=2C&quot=3Bsans-serif&quot=3B=3Bcolor:#1=
F497D=3B">I=0A=
            think that plan B is the right direction. I am wondering if=0A=
            this should be discussed in RTCWEB or MMUSIC</span></p>=0A=
      </div>=0A=
    </blockquote>=0A=
    <br>=0A=
    To the extent that the proposals are attempts to "profile" existing RFC=
s or MMUSIC work in progress for use in WebRTC=2C it seems to me like the d=
iscussion belongs in RTCWEB. One advantage of that approach is that the sol=
ution need not necessarily apply to "all uses of SDP for any scenario for a=
ll time"=2C just to the WebRTC use cases. <br><br>To the extent that NEW SD=
P functionality is needed=2C MMUSIC discussion would be appropriate.&nbsp=
=3B But until the general direction is decided=2C it won't be clear what th=
e required new functionality is (if any).&nbsp=3B <br>=0A=
    <br>=0A=
    <blockquote cite=3D"mid:008701ce4b21$a0997aa0$e1cc6fe0$@gmail.com">=0A=
      <div class=3D"ecxWordSection1">=0A=
        <p class=3D"ecxMsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt=3Bfont-fa=
mily:&quot=3BCalibri&quot=3B=2C&quot=3Bsans-serif&quot=3B=3Bcolor:#1F497D=
=3B"></span></p><br></div></blockquote></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_f739abbd-a421-4394-b155-2762a690f704_--
