IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion

Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226921F9B08 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvyPKequkUdA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF5321F9A23 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAO7m3FF20VFL/2dsb2JhbAANTYM7wVWBKIMXAQEBBAEBATUbGwoRCxgJFg8JAwIBAgEVMBMGAgEBiBenTZIPBI9yFoNeA6xA
Received: from ppp118-209-81-75.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([118.209.81.75]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2013 14:19:21 +0930
Message-ID: <51DCE7CB.7080205@nteczone.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:49:15 +1000
From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <p0624061acd691d9b38bc@dhcp-42ec.meeting.ietf.org> <B0295A41-BF2B-4520-8495-7A88B4803F30@acmepacket.com> <5144E4E5.4030801@omnitor.se> <03559DEF-E442-4118-A616-8D7E42D1F22A@acmepacket.com> <5145729C.6030905@omnitor.se> <514FE5A9.3060900@nteczone.com> <p06240615cdfea836f364@[99.111.97.136]> <51DBB813.4060607@nteczone.com> <p0624060ece02360a322d@[99.111.97.136]> <51DC9B66.6090302@omnitor.se>
In-Reply-To: <51DC9B66.6090302@omnitor.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 04:49:23 -0000

I wouldn't have thought that it would be use case specific... i.e. i'd 
only include my language when I called an emergency service. I would 
think an endpoint would be configured with the information and then 
provide it whenever I made a call. Is that the intent?

Christian

On 10/07/2013 9:23 AM, Gunnar Hellstrom wrote:
> On 2013-07-09 23:58, Randall Gellens wrote:
>> This is a different, and more complex, scenario than what this 
>> proposal is trying to solve.  This proposal is focused on simpler 
>> cases where someone places an emergency call or calls a corporate 
>> call center.  Possibly this can be just a simple case of the more 
>> complex cases? 
> My view is that it is intended to also cover user-to-user cases, where 
> preferences are compared and a relay service (or language interpreter) 
> can be invoked to bridge language gaps.
>
> Gunnar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email