IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 15 October 2013 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3661211E818C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VX4036ieXJ32 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98ABD11E8140 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orochi.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9FGDhhk070462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:13:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <525D69B2.7080905@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:13:38 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <525C7537.4080209@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnV+VihxB1X_KdaG5fAAVfuk2s06fQKApxFHWd_wG8Wksw@mail.gmail.com> <C5BA15C5-34BF-4ACA-B41A-B65927801346@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnV1aXP6LJ6KYsob4TbG2H5o0+4532AxGBA6npGm5DjbNg@mail.gmail.com>, <525CB632.3030602@nostrum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4BEEE8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4BEEE8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:13:56 -0000

On 10/15/13 11:04, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> - Then, Alice sends a POF, which adds "d" to the BUNDLE group, AND 
> also requests the "d" address to become the new BUNDLE address.

I think you've simply identified one more class of thing we need to 
prohibit in a partial offer. Either that or:

> The easiest way to prevent this would be to say that an Offer/POF, 
> MUST include all m- lines which may be affected (explictily or 
> implicitly) by the Offer/POF.

Which I think would work, but (for the cases we care about for WebRTC, 
at least) would be approximately as likely to glare as a full offer.


/a

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status