Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP ports even when rtcp-mux is used
"Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mperumal@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC5D11E80BA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6AwOs402l8DF for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6811E80AA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mperumal@cisco.com; l=2731; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1341515684; x=1342725284; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kmJ0v4u5QAFe9VMPWopYHYGFW5MYnwfEXQWz68wfWp4=; b=Iq02HEJBl3tXFSuLDqtxt6B0lxxImPYgOgKjKKN3M5iFwaa95ZGxQNoA mAU3pC7dX4Ic69Vs/IFdGxtDL4sx3PBBGNGaX36o+J715cz8kYfkH84x5 Jx9qT2k4nV73wXUjWLS1Tm0dqROQvw8MMA3f2sNhC0XGTS5H9km6/XI7B k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAHLn9U+tJXG9/2dsb2JhbABFtzCBB4IYAQEBBAEBAQ8BJzQXBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHJwsUCQgCBAESCBqHaQuZVaAKBIs5hV5gA6NUgWaCX4FWBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,531,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="98914157"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2012 19:14:43 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q65JEgvw031155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:14:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.223]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:14:31 -0500
From: "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP ports even when rtcp-mux is used
Thread-Index: AQHNWjGlnaxSmEpWZUODzqGn4/YWUZcbDTdQ
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:14:41 +0000
Message-ID: <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE2012B50B6@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853405AF4182@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853405AF4182@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.84.140]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19022.000
x-tm-as-result: No--36.304200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP ports even when rtcp-mux is used
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:14:30 -0000
Hi Christer, I think the question boils down to whether the fallback port for RTCP described in section 5.1.3 of RFC5761 could be the same as the RTP port. This looks fine from a pragmatic point of view. However, the following statements from RFC5761 seem to forbid it: On receipt of the answer, the offerer looks for the presence of the "a=rtcp-mux" line for each media where multiplexing was offered. If this is present, then connectivity checks proceed as if only a single candidate (for RTP) were offered, and multiplexing is used once the session is established. If the "a=rtcp-mux" line is not present, the session proceeds with connectivity checks using both RTP and RTCP candidates, eventually leading to a session being established with RTP and RTCP on separate ports (as signalled by the "a=rtcp:" attribute). Not sure if the statement "eventually leading to a session being established with RTP and RTCP on separate ports" was intentional. If not, it needs to be fixed. Muthu |-----Original Message----- |From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg |Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:39 AM |To: mmusic@ietf.org |Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP ports even when rtcp-mux is used | |Hi, | |A question related to RTP/RTCP multiplexing with BUNDLE. | |BUNDLE allows the usage of identical port numbers for multiple m- lines. It also |expects a remote endpoint that does not support BUNDLE to send media associated |with multiple m- lines to that single port, even if the remote endpoint itself will use |different ports for each m- line. | |In addition, the BUNDLE client can also multiplex RTP and RTCP, using the a=rtcp-mux attribute. | |However, RFC 5761 says that one must be able to receive RTCP on the default RTCP port, |if the remote endpoint does not support a=rtcp-mux attribute. | |But, even if the remote endpoint does not support RTCP/RTP muxing, the question is whether |the local endpoint could still use the same port for RTCP/RTP - and expect the remote endpoint |to send both RTP and RTCP to that single port (even if the remote endpoint itself uses different |ports for RTP and RTCP). In addition to the a=rtcp-mux attribute, the local endpoint |would use the a=rtcp attribute, containing the RTP port value. | |That would also, when ICE is used, prevent the local endpoint from having to reserve |RTCP specific candidate ports. | |Regards, | |Christer |_______________________________________________ |mmusic mailing list |mmusic@ietf.org |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
- [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP ports e… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP por… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP por… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP por… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP por… Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE and separate RTP and RTCP por… Magnus Westerlund