Re: [MMUSIC] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-mmusic-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C69131313; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:19:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSMfCUbcmKvs; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8A4131310; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0UIJ4KD092713 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:19:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1548872349; bh=0z4lEnABYD4OE1owKDU3LGRHttI17KlkoOVw7yBSGCk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=FMo8WrYlyj2X1ajtgoyG0i3wI5SCgY6XEisfEsGmJzmzizP5qThGCNM8BImLMF8Gx zMQQKddjm+kG/K/3Cd2qhar/2hBvkZHQiwHQ0GwjlCJkKZLwOGrr9LnGBL6Y0VYMDm TkxU1GTJ8rA7n80W2LgDrKHuRoNyROeaGpXh4b0A=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <34085545-E9E6-446C-B38E-470D3E53C971@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DAF5D418-233C-464A-9F17-3B8B3BF40FC3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:19:01 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dbvQycpJXuVxSThfiprwSjvZb_W+RXS_9ijUFQxMc3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <154880461575.7794.1142924388349151976.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <22CE8FE0-CBFF-4666-A6F5-7494466C9ABA@nostrum.com> <CAKKJt-dbvQycpJXuVxSThfiprwSjvZb_W+RXS_9ijUFQxMc3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/dSPefe6vtDBpSSfAcXrtLm0In9E>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-mmusic-04-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:19:12 -0000


> On Jan 30, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Ben,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:56 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com <mailto:ben@nostrum.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jan 29, 2019, at 5:30 PM, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> > charter-ietf-mmusic-04-00: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mmusic/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mmusic/>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I would be a Yes after the responsible AD ballots Yes.
> >
> >
> 
> Sigh. Done.
> 
> I'm sorry, I didn't make it clear that's not a criticism - it happens (especially with charters) that ADs wait to ballot Yes until some final cleanup happens, and I've gotten too enthusiastic and balloted Yes when I was the only Yes - which would result in whatever we're balloting on being approved, whether the responsible AD was a Yes or not.
> 
> So I try to Curb My Enthusiasm :-)

I was sighing at my own oversight, not the fact you noticed it :-). (Or maybe I was sighing at the fact the data tracker is not consistent in behavior between charters and drafts.)

> 
> And now, I can ballot Yes with a clear conscience.
> 
> Spencer
> 
> Ben.