IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 02 November 2016 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC981295B3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1IrfwG0rLOxl for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu [18.7.68.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3880126FDC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1207440d-4ddff700000009a7-30-581a719fac40
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 45.3A.02471.F917A185; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:07:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-73-186-127-100.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.186.127.100]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id uA2N7ARq017153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:07:11 -0400
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <D7470941-FF03-44E4-A23B-BCD81060C822@iii.ca> <CABcZeBPvxSEV6VhdSJmRFbpq4W8LXC0aNncrtcyqjc++=n_VhQ@mail.gmail.com> <30ecd454-9e29-fe83-53c6-9be8eccf8a4b@cisco.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <e024ef31-8f9c-ca58-32a6-ed76087eaeea@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:07:10 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <30ecd454-9e29-fe83-53c6-9be8eccf8a4b@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqLugUCrCYPp3foupyx+zODB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr4/rpr0wFZ0UrJu07ydbA+Eugi5GTQ0LAROLdpWVMXYxcHEIC lxklWq/1MUM4b5gkjs+bytrFyMEhLKApMfWqIUiDiICwxIy3f9kgajYzSsza9IARJMEmoCUx 59B/FhCbV8BeYumMK0wgNouAisTc+a/BakQF0iS2r9vNDFEjKHFy5hOwek4BW4mzs9exgdjM QPaduRA1zALyEs1bZzNPYOSbhaRlFpKyWUjKFjAyr2KUS8wpzdXNTczMKU5N1i1OTszLSy3S NdLLzSzRS00p3cQICTPeHYz/18kcYhTgYFTi4c34IRkhxJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZT381OgEF9S fkplRmJxRnxRaU5q8SFGCQ5mJRFekQKpCCHelMTKqtSifJiUNAeLkjiv2hJ1PyGB9MSS1OzU 1ILUIpisDAeHkgRvCUijYFFqempFWmZOCUKaiYMTZDgP0HDDfJDhxQWJucWZ6RD5U4yKUuK8 10ASAiCJjNI8uF5YGnjFKA70ijCvA8gKHmAKget+BTSYCWiweZIEyOCSRISUVAOjX2rv7ZcX fh5Rjl0UUctbo+K29f+B9ozFcwsq3AoOfazQWrw94nWMTu28jAOz0l/9OR8fpTBv+/RTD0On n9PsetM6OWnzXJHzKVGXmfbPVbPbG7Vs6eGPxRLOM93PtybLiZSWVN8W9RZ8VD+v8mPNjwQd t7lz7fJ/3vxnu7IlJjlj18bbd5b4KLEUZyQaajEXFScCANNVfgneAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/dpoyn6OEkQnTWB5zX5TtKjP_KA0>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 23:07:14 -0000

On 11/2/16 5:03 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies and everybody's willingness to find a
> solution that everybody can live with.
>
> I believe we have agreement from all the major stakeholders to move
> forward with the proposal below - if anybody agrees with that direction,
> now would be the time to speak up.

Yes, I agree. (I think you probably meant to say "disagree" above.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Absent any further input on this, we
> will declare this as the new consensus on how to proceed.
>
> It also does not sound like we need the call we had tentatively
> scheduled for Friday - please let us know if you disagree.
>
> Thanks
>
> -- Flemming (with chair hat on)
>
>
>
> On 11/2/16 4:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> This seems satisfactory to me in principle. I haven't read the drafts,
>> but I will if we decide that that's the way forward.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca
>> <mailto:fluffy@iii.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     So Martin and I talked today about how to move forward on this. We
>>     think that we have a proposal that meets everyones requirements
>>     (you will groan when you hear but just ask yourself if you can
>>     live with it vs is it your favorite because we think everyone
>>     could live with this)
>>
>>     We discussed two paths 1) split to two drafts, one with update for
>>     multiple fingerprints and separate extension that adds sha256. 2)
>>     just obsolete 4572 with new RFC. Martin prefers the obsolete path
>>     and I can live with that so that’s our proposal. To make this
>>     happen quickly, I converted 4572 to markdown and you can find it
>>     in the master branch at https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis
>>     <https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis> and took the changes from
>>     Christer's draft and turned them in to a PR for bis draft. If you
>>     like to review on GitHub, you can check out PR at
>>     https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis/pull/1/files
>>     <https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis/pull/1/files> If you just want
>>     to see what the final draft would look like, it is attached to
>>     this email.
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mmusic mailing list
>>     mmusic@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email