Re: [MMUSIC] Offer/Answer PT Questions

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 22 February 2016 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A241A9175 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-4gu-zlxpoY for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 208271A88DC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 5so92334750igt.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TJXEMl3kUV78EhXkyY1mBld7kCq3sjXJFgLrdhNqOKQ=; b=T3WNwHqqEG4ChlblSQmA5TM94V+UhaRqlSB6/Z08yqzu8wmoH4PH/5HwQacVmXCJKj nqCjcrgjR2/auCGOZwEaPM57E6RTmwTIBuvZPZQnMmxHPHQHt2i/43T0CPrgkWiAY1lw QORLVebRhrKsZg+oACnmp2/ZxuW3xicPYNRR+FZvStZLUbwCEXAm2NIi3co8oe8zw3nA snOK9ZdRKD9OyQoP6ilmlnlab/V4ufYV1V0x7+HUlQuZE10H+vkybi48BYFCkAd+68NA gkiomWgwl4yVw5oEZqpT0GkuHm0AV5AxdDuPKr9O23h1saZNyBSyt+XpJSklABsTempI MG0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TJXEMl3kUV78EhXkyY1mBld7kCq3sjXJFgLrdhNqOKQ=; b=G89Ey5yya6h0asK1OEIVXnCiPTGSeOB+SKhY4aTgV++ax0CIGYMeMcIVr2pXbTkOqm rBOyPqSSqipYIX1n4J6nVdGRgafIWgX2EY+RstQahKbtWVvycY1Q8cSBj8DjHODc1hhk 0XunzldB4dubWIAFzgDky62us02DBmOhw57Awn3qK88tRQzJLL8W7Mznr0UY129efzO6 g7UOq7Ud/h77Lb7zI5qSLxf62BaHx8lEZKPKY5e3X7+4D0hQMzJu+F4Il3g72xdt552Q Sru0766vYXqhSvClhMfHPlKctWPMluDf6CXj5yjUviQ2xA62plCkE1kJZ43r2TGap5UP Ziyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSHwyVkmUpqeqNCVkGPT2vuubALBRkwMEZeKiLxagnOSn8MuCzor5wWBDigRQO3RA==
X-Received: by 10.50.85.6 with SMTP id d6mr12661280igz.41.1456178517362; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com. [209.85.213.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ei2sm9994697igc.11.2016.02.22.14.01.55 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y8so97718011igp.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.194 with SMTP id y2mr6379115igl.96.1456178515258; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.105.77 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:01:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56CB79BB.9080906@alum.mit.edu>
References: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E8365615E419C0@MISOUT7MSGUSRDB.ITServices.sbc.com> <56C89F86.7020401@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E35E33@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxsDGhSA1WpzVVEvdd0CQdbnFn+ST+ZP_=aYVWBVdKKs4g@mail.gmail.com> <56CB6DB6.30802@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E36086@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <56CB79BB.9080906@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:01:55 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxv2gPRq+5B2uaSERmrfweDO4viEOHon9bG1EWTiWD4xTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxv2gPRq+5B2uaSERmrfweDO4viEOHon9bG1EWTiWD4xTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bfea0b621bf81052c62fb81"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/e9gmbdanUFrSj4Wm3OYtXdMvnAM>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Offer/Answer PT Questions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:01:59 -0000

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> OTOH, when the current definition breaks a common use case, leading to
> common violation of the spec, then we have good justification for a change.
>
>
I think you have mentioned before that 3rd party call control cannot
possibly track all the PT for the session which causes common violation for
the spec. Is this justification enough?
_____________
Roman Shpount