IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DISCUSION Q6: Do we always mandate 2 Offer/Answers during session establishment?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 09 September 2013 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAEC21F9B28 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-LvULKQC8Vl for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA1621F9C20 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj3so3803416wib.13 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=O/CSgoH/rgOOYeZfvkqwmJ8xmPKONX9iC5u5aTg+Kwg=; b=txLoGuTgWotzDmqIcvV4o3yrLwmnpzOCyYX5TPkV8RdNAiP7upEhFCkf7unVLrTtGU YXx26imghJ3BqjGWHVInJgOdSm8cXeesXnVzb00w3f5HQ4ZaozLbvvMLgrOUm/JasVwA yv9HIg6Fh1KrNiBwtkqtUZh/gYTPYVbNvh4NYxDD5q2knL6FVEbYOvclmpsh1hT+C6Ds i84wrGKkZEtVOiDylW4FqP4CZyqgglT3ZjHisyCUBZtPujCJaTHLFIP3vcPMbID+t20E NV+E0jBsERG0d8PeDnwvrv4sGJj1kL2y4t8GSzUHXdICnMM4+jXzAqviwUXA/xE86pFE Oezw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.188.132 with SMTP id ga4mr9641838wic.10.1378750924672; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C49B7D4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C483C45@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <5224F4BB.8000904@alum.mit.edu> <CAOJ7v-20smCmAYG_be_4g2PwDigXKJu+x6yRkAzPXJ_YHWse-Q@mail.gmail.com> <522A27AB.1020102@alum.mit.edu> <CABkgnnWA7n7jy9T7cROTZSKrKAc9jCwb=68Whqt7qvVMgCQ8yA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C499BB7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnXBQobdfqVzrr=Mq9P9iDcZN=5TJze+Ld=HpN=iuhp6gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1gjeD0gfbCOfubbEZo80ZH+p8d5gKO==UdyQx_jjY5bw@mail.gmail.com> <522D8D1E.9080407@alvestrand.no> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C49B1A3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnUcfEQy7C3BSyA_-r5g9x=9HbU6p31i7qGfGVEMcesn3Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C49B7D4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 11:22:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUKkJhyFwVqAJrz_xJiM0To2hXyAadBENQkazVQwKOi6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DISCUSION Q6: Do we always mandate 2 Offer/Answers during session establishment?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:22:13 -0000

On 9 September 2013 10:45, Christer Holmberg
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Sure. If the Offerer assigns a previously negotiated BUNDLE address (or, an address that will become the new BUNDLE address) to those m- lines, there is no need for a second o/a exchange.

Perhaps the single m-line offer/answer performed to establish the data
channel will include BUNDLE, but it would be a little redundant.  It
depends on whether we require that in order to provide knowledge about
support for BUNDLE.

When you talk about initial offer, you should really be talking about
the first offer that contains BUNDLE.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email