Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E3E12996C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTEXWGesmQRt for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x231.google.com (mail-yb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3BC129929 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id d128so9590758ybh.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h1I2DIK8cxs7tfX24sNPrlog2OQ2hXusGwwQntWdLcs=; b=qGNq4SMUnosc4yy0FntsN25u0ENiUu8x5XwmYJA/J9VHTwULsyfK7FYCT7Bi1+OtGM I5ONPIkFiHuI4Nb+iPBNCTIjEfHTIBO3GF07sOHD08PdaIEVVQHQmJnZaLlVPrLZ5Gw1 3PfcxtehCD4IY6ca8RCSLnFLWDdd6v0svc9xYTbCGSAvPDbRtbJFGIjkGabTRyxdRgj+ v+xrnpsdTvuItPg+v3q+oPQJNQ7/1XRYS2O1I53sSDRUuj7BVAFpmt6DpeWB7vv0ug5Q SRJzCXsB5bo2Z86+xeamXGLOq0k8bc9ZbaSyvbomSzRNn15QXEVPBQJURoL8N+GC4g2Y 7vTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h1I2DIK8cxs7tfX24sNPrlog2OQ2hXusGwwQntWdLcs=; b=T30rC9vun0hVkQ6YE2iKRVdbAgVNJbmbg0vhEAvi7VDIZSaq1LovWyrt+kW/KrB8GR FM7MK218RPAkKp7MozQ/q8rDqQVPx4LZ1G25edDSip2OHWIltiP2KFW+RaVQku/HZaXt 7VZjdUfagAIqaSy0VjrOLNxCixaL51evIbRECfv2hpt4CbyuSvQ7JAmHxyZWafIldc/J 4z1eY3dFvUhJn8kqQwP3klJLrmZtv8mxqY2DwNzNMi3uQpLdocdagepSTNbdzRFZ9Sow UxJhTQhkT0ku1H8hXREvfPPTtsnaCj/rKm9l8/Uf0zZRxt/vGsJwkaun6ICg1kk7Vjhk 9AjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd9I894kDUCJZcVv/9Tc3aS0OrjCDs/2gyxpZ3JB16jnCyQ4hR/UdKYrs518uYxaArMmclXR1OGuuQ6IQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.171.204 with SMTP id v70mr4199226ybi.80.1478119476492; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.159.141 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D7470941-FF03-44E4-A23B-BCD81060C822@iii.ca>
References: <D7470941-FF03-44E4-A23B-BCD81060C822@iii.ca>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:43:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPvxSEV6VhdSJmRFbpq4W8LXC0aNncrtcyqjc++=n_VhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0921125540cc05405782bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/eVw2UfFkC9ajfyjHnR9zZzeztCI>
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:44:41 -0000

This seems satisfactory to me in principle. I haven't read the drafts, but
I will if we decide that that's the way forward.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> So Martin and I talked today about how to move forward on this. We think
> that we have a proposal that meets everyones requirements (you will groan
> when you hear but just ask yourself if you can live with it vs is it your
> favorite because we think everyone could live with this)
>
> We discussed two paths 1) split to two drafts, one with update for
> multiple fingerprints and separate extension that adds sha256. 2) just
> obsolete 4572 with new RFC. Martin prefers the obsolete path and I can live
> with that so that’s our proposal. To make this happen quickly, I converted
> 4572 to markdown and you can find it in the master branch at
> https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis and took the changes from Christer's
> draft and turned them in to a PR for bis draft. If you like to review on
> GitHub, you can check out PR at https://github.com/fluffy/
> 4572bis/pull/1/files If you just want to see what the final draft would
> look like, it is attached to this email.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>