Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 28 May 2014 08:07 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20FD1A0873 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 01:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePR8O1wuCQoN for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 01:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA0E1A03D7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 01:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79226d000004024-5f-538599552314
Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 40.81.16420.55995835; Wed, 28 May 2014 10:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.28]) by ESESSHC002.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 28 May 2014 10:07:49 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
Thread-Index: AQHPeglmopg+utwmsUCj+eNbSa1y65tVo0Wg
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 08:07:46 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3418D1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CFAA77B1.3CC7D%alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CFAA77B1.3CC7D%alissa@cooperw.in>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7YzNZggzfP2Symn/nLaDF1+WMW ByaPL09eMnksWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjwrqcghdsFVNWbWZpYLzA1sXIySEhYCJx 4GEHE4QtJnHh3nqgOBeHkMBRRolfp84yQjiLGSXuTHvP3sXIwcEmYCHR/U8bpEFEwEui+dhu RhBbWMBa4su/w8wgJSICNhJrt6lBlBhJ7Do8AyzMIqAq8X+NOkiYV8BXYv7v92CdQgJ6Ep+P NYDZnAL6Ehf/vmEHsRmBzvl+ag3YacwC4hK3nsyHOlNAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsRYmdZ9vB VjELaEqs36UP0aooMaX7ITvEWkGJkzOfsExgFJ2FZOoshI5ZSDpmIelYwMiyilG0OLU4KTfd yFgvtSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMwOg5u+a26g/HyG8dDjAIcjEo8vAsutQQLsSaWFVfmHmKU5mBR Eue9qFEdLCSQnliSmp2aWpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoGReSYXc9kN9rOcV0S/RM67/+5cAWP1 T7vrdQlTDRrXRUV+0WlPkTIKKm3j/KNcyTFncl3zPekFX/qP+jctmhLv+zP31paVUb73JKbN d8wOXcGaFND64bCR7nP7oBZVlVJxA9kywZWv1Va9qW0091z2NGfzQ4Mal6STEjOLL/699ua5 5iufVyuVWIozEg21mIuKEwGCbaR7bwIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/eoSB_bVgGixNQQU_WZ1MWxCx55I
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 08:07:57 -0000
Hi Alissa, Thanks for your review and comments! Reply inline. >I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. It’s in good shape. I will issue the last call. Couple of nits to be resolved with any last call comments: > >Section 1: >s/clearly defined, well understood and implementations are widely available./clearly defined and well understood and implementations are widely available./ > >Section 4.5: >s/same rules of for/same rules for/ We'll do the changes as suggested. Do you want us to do them now, before the IESG review, and submit a new version of the draft? Regards, Christer
- [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-d… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udp… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udp… Alissa Cooper