[MMUSIC] PCP implementation status [was Re: Draft MMUSIC Meeting Minutes from IETF88]
Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 02:57 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123261AE10A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:57:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydvMNasEb-6P for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20DD1AE107 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:57:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=996; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386644240; x=1387853840; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wlQpY9OsC14tW+zWYskeRmZ1TWy/RiyfWiLHlkCxqTw=; b=O+/JvXZm3GIHIs6yqnWiqwxkQ2sCdscDK8M2DeoCHXr+mzvV8CqJj7Bk /u/dw5Q8kNzEsQOjBiTf1pjBt9Qz4JHI30yWiz3MJoM66DSJk06UPP7ZB rr9RbdQ2yb0tIJxEE/b7CGmMknUdUtZShOOppSZu19p355J8gfxwr36GZ I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAHyCplKrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4uWaBIhZ0giUBAQECAQFnEgULUVcGEwmHcwUOwE0XjxAHgyCBEwOJQo5SkhOBa4FfGw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,862,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="97462763"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2013 02:57:20 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn2-347.cisco.com (sjc-vpn2-347.cisco.com [10.21.113.91]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBA2vHW5024842; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:57:17 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52A2548E.3030400@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:57:17 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1BD2AAA8-6FC3-46B1-9435-F138EFA7B1A6@cisco.com>
References: <52A2548E.3030400@cisco.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] PCP implementation status [was Re: Draft MMUSIC Meeting Minutes from IETF88]
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:57:26 -0000
On Dec 6, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> wrote: > Greetings > > We have uploaded the draft meeting minutes for the two MMUSIC sessions at IETF 88 in Vancouver at: > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/minutes/minutes-88-mmusic > > Please take a look and let us know if you have any questions or comments. Perhaps not to add to your meeting minutes, but I remembered this while reviewing the minutes: "Lennox: Is PCP seeing substantial deployment at this point ? • Dan: Some for PCP but none for this extension. There is a document in RTCWeb describing the value. Vendors making Carrier Grade NATs are interested/supporting. Can be implemented entirely in user-space." at the PCP meeting on Friday morning, Stuart Cheshire presented that iOS 7, OS X 10.9 (Mavericks), and Apple Airports implement PCP with NAT-PMP feature parity, http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-pcp-5.pdf. -d
- [MMUSIC] Draft MMUSIC Meeting Minutes from IETF88 Flemming Andreasen
- [MMUSIC] PCP implementation status [was Re: Draft… Dan Wing