[MMUSIC] RTSP "alt-ports" are not mentioned in the RFC.

Dushyant Joshi <dushyant2u@gmail.com> Thu, 13 December 2012 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dushyant2u@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D91D21F8929 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkWzuFlojnvg for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66D921F8952 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fw7so2020682vcb.31 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Wjo5ZHm1Xm0mYa3gqHbRAGOnYkmi7XpT2IdXFsZnmfU=; b=PgKZjFDZrWFRNNNoFyPCnzgw/kTCB3utfa7jOdWh2B8xM+oQADki3sjPQR3J21G86/ dXMVjl/gnHQu2a4lsIiCvo6wLIoOYy1+n460xqAUJDoEv5q421uJyfAsDV0ukT+J9E+O 2B0ZXKv9nWaHkbhlHYfDCmbNovAHSMhSz/phydWjg9ygagIIGL9MZcvJSWZ+5/LM+B46 vAT2YvSgqWwDVX9E+8eZRav1dX+GcrGi/fL9/N8MJIUE+7iNZ4v0a7cz8CmN+tOsxg4I xf6PnlSSo4EFwPHczmfUUpXm4WMkGU03QZ0ivlcLRlZUtpTa9WKkdER7IejirCSDoQEC q/nQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.88.33 with SMTP id bd1mr1985638vdb.70.1355395363191; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.79.143 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:12:43 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+TAfnm2p_TtF=x2_jm+YR_NVk94gBDYnKtQcy13307-YmiZQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dushyant Joshi <dushyant2u@gmail.com>
To: mmusic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:54:43 -0800
Subject: [MMUSIC] RTSP "alt-ports" are not mentioned in the RFC.
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:43:50 -0000

Hello team,

I could see RTSP alt-ports are not defined in either RFC 2326 or RFC 6064

if you see IANA

http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xml

we have defined port 8554 as the alternate RTSP port

rtsp            554/tcp    Real Time Stream Control Protocol
rtsp            554/udp    Real Time Stream Control Protocol
rtsp-alt        8554/tcp   RTSP Alternate (see port 554)
rtsp-alt        8554/udp   RTSP Alternate (see port 554)

The RTSP 2.0 specification is still an Internet Draft and could add text.
 can we add this as an informative mentioning that there do exist an
alternative registered port.

Regards,
Dushyant Joshi
91-9886886757