Re: [MMUSIC] Progressing draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis

Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DBB1AE3E9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:58:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.435
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RE3ZSfqLarzh for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:58:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cserver5.myshophosting.com (175-107-161-1.myshophosting.com [175.107.161.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446EA1AE3E8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:58:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppp118-209-100-27.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.100.27]:54577 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by cserver5.myshophosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>) id 1VjdC5-00035p-N3 for mmusic@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:57:53 +1100
Message-ID: <528E8FFF.3030405@nteczone.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:58:07 +1100
From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <528DDF12.6030701@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <528DDF12.6030701@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cserver5.myshophosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nteczone.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cserver5.myshophosting.com: authenticated_id: christian.groves@nteczone.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Progressing draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:58:19 -0000

Hello

I would support publishing this spec. Draft ITU-T H.248.66 makes 
reference to the RTSP2.0 work. It has been held up for a couple of years 
waiting for the RTSP2.0 draft to be published. It would be good to put 
this to bed.

Regards, Christian

On 21/11/2013 9:23 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Folks,
>
> the IESG is reviewing the RTSP 2.0 spec below:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis/
>
> Before progressing the draft, I have been asked by the IESG to check
> with the MMUSIC WG whether or not people still think it is worthwhile
> publishing this spec. In particular, they would like to know what level
> of deployment we can expect once the spec is published.
>
> Your input is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>