Re: [MMUSIC] Reference update from 4566 to 4566bis?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 05 May 2020 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1195E3A0AD7 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.991
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnfyI1qeyNK8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr680078.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.68.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5E53A0AD6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gEFRQkh8beQazv39P2jGPHoBCKJrr+GTUwFZUjglp029TdxexXkLJcrGa5X1AdPY1aqS6kHlmh/4exTgfH8QX23cq2tIPopV2YA6eQHXPyVsOiWY1un6AbSXwxjYno+4SXAdJpMvxylNc82mH37L+ijknTrrhOjy+WmJzM8IWurfLYSKeZd+8/NIbdrLNsdieIu/SrctVmq/PK+edh1NuFvtVHxo8JwfmwV18YeOn0KIb/Wn91UUQP64bOn/Kgw+7lryYij1ROGD6QnLhcENzD4y5HiyVAS48Il7juO2qY7AfBafQoykkpv3h8hfCw+GqIDuWVv3xIBZ+AsbJPbvSQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BrtbuQ79tA59dtwCBHGWT3SedtJnqyasiu18gM8SX1A=; b=Ahlcn+4/vgxsrWIIoVAYB8upkLYIxsfnFr3gsDd9NLJd6z8IdvVnnSTJXwUgNyEeFgmbN0VhibbeH7tt+2XyNp7trqVHJLUhc5i5PVBnmjbC8hNOrfEoYAKV0Wb5b9gMGbs19gp+IKHS6ZBHu+0yp37RX9vUUVBHrkx2BlIadmK6xqMAYT8jbeOduHcNhsREHAOw+sQNsaQ6+/uEHurcAtx4/Z0nhwDP5wp/RbWZl6tvrJ25gr5haYWrwnmnQY2eiAr31BQLYjffF0WTD/g8I90U2uNvhR0HRWqf6ewKrGm9m3UgMPWYuQvdgLATTytKhE9lcMJVxcHnwuVfWWP3MA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=permerror (sender ip is 18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BrtbuQ79tA59dtwCBHGWT3SedtJnqyasiu18gM8SX1A=; b=ZLOR8eVuO02nW0jQ0qeA3B7sJGw9jflh2ldwRecF/8OZPAQexsgHD4vifD/nDZ5uQK2nS+1di17aMCBmfPCNsVuueIGoGNcIxUzK9TN1OiK4MbFAmueph0qJ1/c7zX2uEdPCVp1Pmp+71zNH9B7WwJ9qe6niUcg+MYjVKkFTcXY=
Received: from DM5PR1101CA0008.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4c::18) by SA0PR12MB4525.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:92::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:55:59 +0000
Received: from CY1NAM02FT017.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:4c:cafe::2) by DM5PR1101CA0008.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:4c::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.26 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:55:59 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=permerror (sender IP is 18.7.68.33) smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: PermError (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu used an invalid SPF mechanism)
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by CY1NAM02FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.27 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:55:58 +0000
Received: from Kokiri.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 045KttG3030214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:55:57 -0400
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <12B81692-4EA9-4AC2-8F46-DE3E1A39BE8C@ericsson.com> <f93ff4b8-3485-893c-e2ed-316babf8fe05@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMA_pVqaUk7XM80F+G-8MtGgj2Nh+pmFCb2GPJYLH6rXcQ@mail.gmail.com> <0BAA16C9-B53A-4EBD-B133-ED111DBE92CA@ericsson.com> <CA+9kkMBLEAJ-by5QQ3=QC9BYwa14gwzBGXG8QF-eOuyGA410Xw@mail.gmail.com> <902AA3CC-2724-4666-BEF0-7005F96654AC@ericsson.com> <BFE5DC5F-6B15-4179-A0EE-3CE291E914E8@ericsson.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <776c463e-bf2e-9e9e-2293-fd08129afcb0@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 16:55:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BFE5DC5F-6B15-4179-A0EE-3CE291E914E8@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(136003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(46966005)(33430700001)(31696002)(26005)(75432002)(2906002)(6916009)(36906005)(86362001)(70586007)(786003)(316002)(478600001)(70206006)(53546011)(8676002)(8936002)(186003)(7596003)(47076004)(82310400002)(336012)(956004)(31686004)(33440700001)(5660300002)(2616005)(82740400003)(356005)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 95f5c1bc-e285-4ea8-df0f-08d7f136b637
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SA0PR12MB4525:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <SA0PR12MB4525F13C8EFD7F563EAE28A4F9A70@SA0PR12MB4525.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0394259C80
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2020 20:55:58.1988 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 95f5c1bc-e285-4ea8-df0f-08d7f136b637
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33]; Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA0PR12MB4525
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/gw0rvDoM2dpMOvFW0UWHXdStzcM>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Reference update from 4566 to 4566bis?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 20:56:05 -0000

(I saw this after my prior post.)

On 5/5/20 4:18 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:

> Correct. Unlike ICE (where we also had a discussion in RTCWEB regarding what to reference), 4566bis does not (Paul, please correct me if I'm wrong) provide new or modified functionality where implementations would act differently based on which spec is implemented.

I haven't studied the rtcweb docs in a long time, but AFAIK there are no 
dependencies on 4566bis.

> To be fair, this is mostly a cosmetic thing. We have been working for too-many-years to get the RTCWEB stuff/dependencies done, and the same day as we finally publish the RFCs we immediately end up referencing an obsolete specification :)
> 
>   So, as this should not have any technical impacts, I am not going to push for it. I thought it would be an easy thing to do, and wanted to know what people think, but unless someone can come up with some technical issues with referencing RFC 4566 I am also fine leaving things as they are.

I the interest in progress I agree.

	Thanks,
	Paul