IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Status of draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-10

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 04 November 2016 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759AB129503 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_LDIWGF7ulY for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7380A129406 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074411-fddff700000008d0-45-581ca29f5e28
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 38.A9.02256.F92AC185; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:00:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (c-73-186-127-100.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.186.127.100]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id uA4F0kdX001630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:00:47 -0400
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <AM5PR0701MB2577F389C6DAF09A710402FD8DA20@AM5PR0701MB2577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <23c29e5f-6a1d-71b3-a8f1-c087e8c6743a@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:00:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB2577F389C6DAF09A710402FD8DA20@AM5PR0701MB2577.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqDt/kUyEwYYrVhZTlz9mcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxuTVtxgLTjBVnNxzgL2B8Q9jFyMnh4SAicTX7VdYuxi5OIQE LjNKHF61jB3CecMk8W7JeSaQKmEBD4mm1g4wW0RAWGLG279sILaQQILErPbVzCA2m4CWxJxD /1lAbF4Be4l3n86B1bMIqEjcvd3NCmKLCqRJbF+3mxmiRlDi5MwnYPWcAokSrR3fwWxmAVuJ O3MhapgF5CW2v53DPIGRbxaSlllIymYhKVvAyLyKUS4xpzRXNzcxM6c4NVm3ODkxLy+1SNdU LzezRC81pXQTIyTMBHcwzjgpd4hRgINRiYd3xzSZCCHWxLLiytxDjJIcTEqivKftgUJ8Sfkp lRmJxRnxRaU5qcWHGCU4mJVEeDMWAuV4UxIrq1KL8mFS0hwsSuK8fEvU/YQE0hNLUrNTUwtS i2CyMhwcShK8XiCNgkWp6akVaZk5JQhpJg5OkOE8QMONwYYXFyTmFmemQ+RPMepyvNv87gGT EEtefl6qlDhvHEiRAEhRRmke3BxYenjFKA70ljBvBUgVDzC1wE16BbSECWiJWwjYkpJEhJRU A6Nu7oJEs7LawysNtc78Zpcwz6+5EPSoM67RZxmr1ltL/d19rc5LnjOuLch9cLIu4vafjHOW ryef4ijn0Hpe8exrJsPJVZeDb2uFLe8/M7947la38sXuC67c8ZU//SmnsvpMwN3MZS8kXnjs vTLfcYHauy0PAo4q+VxfqZE5S9+Yr97x0YW3E08psRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAP5UuA+oCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/h-5H2ne_NhH6i0U25CoxzjVxEzk>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Status of draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-10
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:00:49 -0000

On 11/4/16 9:32 AM, Bo Burman wrote:
> Hi MMUSIC,
>
>
>
> Christer, Roman, and Paul had comments related to version -10 of this
> draft and there was some discussion on the list; do you believe that
> those comments are addressed by -10, or are any updates to that draft
> needed?

I already indicated I was happy.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email