Re: [MMUSIC] Single SCTP usage per SDP session?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140E31A0172 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:22:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdV4Af6drwsa for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702E81A00C3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:22:52 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79fc6d000001087-f6-547d76d90ecf
Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 01.C0.04231.9D67D745; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.189]) by ESESSHC011.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.51]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:22:49 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Single SCTP usage per SDP session?
Thread-Index: AdAIiilGRQ9HT1LDRYu/Q2dfZ4TTzAAxes8AAAUE9XD///IzAP//5OAwgABrp4D//7ZsQIAIlnMA//9GRRA=
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:22:48 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D56AD9F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D534E7B@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <2649C056-4D86-4448-B71F-A42954E1BF49@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D538EF9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <07B6DC62-93DB-4C15-BECE-68BB70B663FB@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D5390C0@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17828E63E883@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D539F4F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <547CE88C.40605@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <547CE88C.40605@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6tstoQg8Xr+S2mLn/MYrFiwwFW ByaPv+8/MHksWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj7f35bAWruCo6Tsxka2BczNHFyMkhIWAi sWLjUiYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcYJVY8XckI4SxmlNh9Zx1QFQcHm4CFRPc/bZAGEQFfiWeP b7OB2MJA4Xm72pkh4pYScz69h7KTJGY+ncsK0soioCJxdIMwSJgXqHVe3zVmiPE/mCX+H/wN Vs8poCUx43gzmM0IdND3U2vAjmMWEJe49WQ+1KECEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0n82HCJBaJe R2LB7k9sELa2xLKFr5khFgtKnJz5hGUCo+gsJGNnIWmZhaRlFpKWBYwsqxhFi1OLi3PTjYz1 Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjEC4+Tglt+6OxhXv3Y8xCjAwajEw/vxU02IEGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4WJXHe RefmBQsJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgrNtjk/jlf7DqBe97IqpMjvvEIha/6Dbz MsmeKF/YcnpyyMwCe7fgnv1hc8wTjr0KtXLTKUu8YMFc1PTN1qLnMo+v9+9Jj/vTbj3oN5jX rjxh4/Hza6JSY3IbOLOj39/uXLdfnuMYp36u74WQFtHsiVunzFGfPU3q/MWFLu7Fcnk9nOaZ az4psRRnJBpqMRcVJwIA+934SXQCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/hCmPV-1Sze3mHXvEMCm8jH0jE5c
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Single SCTP usage per SDP session?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:22:54 -0000

Hi,

>>> Per my understanding, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps just talks about SCTP over DTLS and allowing multiple SCTP associations, which is perfectly fine.
>>> Then it is possible to come up with SCTP-SDP semantics to use that capability.
>>> One m= line allowing one SCTP over DTLS limit is fine. Using BUNDLE 
>>> you can replicate same 4-tuple in multiple m= lines. Then there is only one DTLS association established and multiple SCTP associations over that is possible (one per m= line).
>>> If BUNDLE is not used then I believe same 4-tuple on multiple m= 
>>> lines are NOT possible. This is because, per my understanding, unlike TCP/native-SCTP used under non- ICE environments, in ICE-environments the TCP/UDP port specified is used both as client and server port for DTLS.
>>
>> Even with BUNDLE, you would have to use the same m= line port value from the beginning, which is not allowed. So, you basically would have to add the additional SCTPoDTLS m= lines once the usage of BUNDLE has been negotiated.
>
> bundle-only would allow you to set this up.

Correct.

But, then we would need to have rules saying that you are not allowed to move an m= line associated with a SCTP usage out of the BUNDLE group, etc.

Regards,

Christer