Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 28 March 2017 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4758E1296FB for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kVV0QXJVQbE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189741296D8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n5so70507426pgh.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YdQ8xwnvw7ymOvLu8KYcwOhx3A2RfB6Lk48u0PMhWIQ=; b=I7wePxP5nNZfQx3OIN+5o0TK2klZxNJsnNWNLZqXOH3x0Uz7ni520oMIZJySG7lUL0 shQPtlpgXqzS5UR4WsDW/XiEcTYZBzGycClPhBdfdpWTlXTn36+fwryeqCvnyi/6mVjz 8W62ueT/30hdqFUiAHl7ThvPf9x9yJfn4MEZgLYpuYnd669A79TpBh51EWpvzX6M/JCM 0lFjARB9E8KwyVFQsLy9snG2BCFPi9gOl7czR7owNm+iZTlnNvSBpIbal2xFDxVdvlHQ SuM/CvBqSQHfl36lCeOWPSbcf1tSrTseDRPNm+EiEQuYiiqt6BPcjAg63VvcazpEW/ns B2Vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YdQ8xwnvw7ymOvLu8KYcwOhx3A2RfB6Lk48u0PMhWIQ=; b=O/9YS11IMdnCa2vl0MQe8AnLlpKDJQuL5kkiDFwIlFYrj9byUVvx+F1Nk6h1qXlHID HD4m/LcO5Tlp+MkMJ/hIBr9rVzrZZkmXoH5+h+3CnCgvlOIXVlXtlQjUTJbYl7G2hvC/ pVTlz5e8y9ci19Ggcxt/MYoNZxuW2KMXrDv/j3oQ46tmcJ0ShQEknkpZlJjh0emoKjyN 7vcmDjiSN/e+dqTfTG4BxhZa1bMgQ4YWBpYS9LodXyDedE8FA3WavnXSq61JVU8KxHG1 xLuK9CIJfH8s4wDOWZM/UikjOdn28425hIrZgeFOIPd/50GMqCTHByGhD6xgOb7t3hRi tMaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0OdCAmS0DATnWInBmC1FhmtX+dEKrUOIC/MErMLsVbg2BpGJGJSQjRItzIo7Bx5g==
X-Received: by 10.99.61.201 with SMTP id k192mr31669643pga.68.1490720430654; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-f52.google.com (mail-pg0-f52.google.com. [74.125.83.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3sm8566907pfd.57.2017.03.28.10.00.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n5so70506934pgh.0; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.99.127.12 with SMTP id a12mr2654438pgd.5.1490720429608; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.145.151 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB3251B@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
References: <60b45113-8012-9a6c-2019-dea5b57ca7bb@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB31018@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxs=e9-a4=ce3KLWBrCSC9d+wBYbn-k4iqeqvEVxc6WftQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB3251B@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:00:28 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxs3pT1u9rLqTv4F_ck9U0zq3B_V4CnDXMt4dm4OCWnXEg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxs3pT1u9rLqTv4F_ck9U0zq3B_V4CnDXMt4dm4OCWnXEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF MMUSIC WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045e2b6eaa9b4f054bcd65ae
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/hCnAhG129Ap379bALKioCGZHgZI>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:00:44 -0000

Hi Christer,

This sounds good to me.

Regards,

_____________
Roman Shpount

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Roman,
>
>
>
> What about:
>
>
>
> “…media packets in the any previously established DTLS association and…”
>
>
>
> That covers both the currently established and already closed associations.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Roman Shpount [mailto:roman@telurix.com]
> *Sent:* 28 March 2017 02:58
> *To:* Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
> *Cc:* Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>du>; draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.
> all@ietf.org; General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>rg>; IETF MMUSIC WG
> <mmusic@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of
> draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> >Regarding the following in section 5.1:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association, it needs to make sure that media packets in the
> >    existing DTLS association and new DTLS association can be de-
> >    multiplexed.
> >
> >This text presumes there is an existing association. To explicitly cover
> the case where there is not, I suggest the following:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association to replace an existing association, it needs to
> >    ensure that media packets in the existing DTLS association and new
> >    DTLS association can be de-multiplexed.
>
> I could do that. Or, I could use say "make sure that media packets in
> *any* existing DTLS association"
>
>
>
> If we are nitpicking we need to define what "existing" DTLS association
> means here. In this particular case this means any DTLS association for
> which it still possible to receive packets. This includes currently
> established DTLS associations as well as any DTLS association which were
> closed but can still receive packets due to network transmission delays.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
>