Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication

Christer Holmberg <> Tue, 08 January 2013 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9033F21F8B06 for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:56:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QoaMVFtAz5TM for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DE921F8AE3 for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:56:17 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-0c-50ec17703cab
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E9.37.10459.0771CE05; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:56:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:56:15 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication
Thread-Index: Ac3tn4sLCJXHhYY7RfKGLsAQmCTlmA==
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:56:15 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW6B+JsAgwlPpS0ebJ/LaDF1+WMW ByaPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStj0/N+poJVPBW/th9nbWBcyNXFyMkhIWAi Mb97DzOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgUOMEu3N85kgnEWMEt/eLAVyODjYBCwkuv9pgzSICIRK3Ht0 mxUkLCyQK/FpliGIKSKQJ/FnshpEhZ7Epi0n2EBsFgEViYmX77CC2LwC3hKNK5rZQWxGoLXf T61hArGZBcQlbj2ZzwRxjoDEkj3noU4TlXj5+B8rhK0osfNsOzNEvY7Egt2f2CBsbYllC18z Q8wXlDg58wnLBEbhWUjGzkLSMgtJyywkLQsYWVYxsucmZuaklxtuYgSG9cEtv3V3MJ46J3KI UZqDRUmcN8z1QoCQQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGxqb9TOeO2DyReVLD0hC65vux yiOZO2+nVd9/tsjr3uK9LtzT8vJ65yhvd07215k4h6VRQNYkc+7eO2X1+0/wJaY1fD0Wds+w aMXJ7WEbs7iNTO5tWGInH2tueOqQcWburUq33C7Vi77GB1LSX2yRWM10XFaQrdglSfLxyoQZ E+rkCsJfvHX2V2Ipzkg01GIuKk4EACBuX4A5AgAA
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts - Initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:56:18 -0000

Hi Ali,

Some initial comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication:

Q1:	I assume the attribute indicates the SENDING delay, or? I think it needs to be more explicit.

Q2:	There are no SDP Offer/Answer considerations. Does the Offer have impact on the Answer? What is the expected behavior if the Answerer does not support the mechanism? Etc.



-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
Sent: 4. tammikuuta 2013 0:31
Subject: [MMUSIC] The rtp-duplication related drafts

Hi everyone,

The following two drafts have been adopted by MMUSIC a while ago and the main draft discussing the RTP duplication issues is being finalized in AVTEXT (this was also adopted as a WG item a while ago). It is simply waiting for the WG to make a decision on the srcname proposal.

These two mmusic drafts are essentially completed and they are needed to be done for the avtext draft. I hope they will be WGLC'ed some time soon. In the mean time, I would like to get any comments, feedback that you might have.


PS Here is the AVTEXT draft. 
mmusic mailing list