Re: [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments regarding line descriptions in section 5
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 26 July 2019 20:12 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF1A120270 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icPrS6z0nE4V for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (outgoing-alum.mit.edu [18.7.68.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E541201A0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x6QKC80P030065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:12:09 -0400
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <0A9693E7-E320-421B-9AF0-54EB95128C2D@ericsson.com> <25508498-98a6-eeeb-3b3d-9b3a8f5f4295@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB31614298B89EC735AA30001793C00@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <9c1b9653-9602-bfd9-f393-938334e0200d@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:12:08 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB31614298B89EC735AA30001793C00@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/hgh0C-pWIStbKWATjQWISkFK0TM>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments regarding line descriptions in section 5
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:12:23 -0000
On 7/26/19 1:12 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi, > >> It seems to me that these are all minor editorial things. Since the document has already had its IESG review I am >reluctant to make such optional changes. If I were to start I can imagine some further back and forth on the >details of the wording. But I can do these if Adam wants them. > > In my opinion the changes are such minor, and pure editorial, that they don't require a new IESG review etc. > > But, I'll leave it up to you to decide. I should have commented earlier, but I was overwhelmed with other drafts. And I'll leave it to Adam. I do have to make a change regarding IANA instructions. So it could go in then. Thanks, Paul > Regards, > > Christer > > > On 7/24/19 6:13 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had a look at section 5, and I have a couple of minor editorial comments: >> >> Q1: >> >> Section 5.6. says: >> >> “If an email address or phone number is present, it MUST be >> specified before the first media description.” >> >> I don’t think we need that statement. We define elsewhere (both in >> Section 5 and in the syntax) the order of the letters. >> >> --- >> >> Q2: >> >> Section 5.4 says: >> >> “At most one "i=" line can be used for each media description.” >> >> …while section 5.5 says: >> >> “This line is OPTIONAL. No more than one "u=" line is allowed per >> session description.” >> >> …while section 5.6 says: >> >> “Inclusion of an email address or phone number is OPTIONAL.” >> >> I assume “at most one” and “no more than one” means the same thing, >> and if we want to explicitly indicate that something is OPTIONAL we >> should use it in all places where it applies. So, I think it would be >> good to have aligned terminology, e.g.,: >> >> “This X line is OPTIONAL, and at most one X line can be included in a >> media/session description” >> >> --- >> >> Q3: >> >> In section 5.4 the text says twice that there can be at most one “i=” >> line in a media description. Do we need to repeat? >> >> Regards, >> >> Christer >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mmusic mailing list >> mmusic@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >> >
- [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments reg… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 4566bis-36: Minor editorial comments… Paul Kyzivat